it was said:
> I think what you are saying is that if you use PuTTY as a client
> application that you should be concerned about what server you
> connect to? From what you are saying, I suspect that if the only
> use is to connect to your own (FreeBSD) server, you are probably ok?
>
> Jay O'
On Monday 16 August 2004 03:52 pm, stheg olloydson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
> one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
> software.
It is written for *nix and win32, and it has an MIT li
stheg olloydson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
> one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
> software. The SANS Institute "@Risk" newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains
> the following item regarding PuTTY:
>
> 04.31.4
Hello,
Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
software. The SANS Institute "@Risk" newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains
the following item regarding PuTTY:
04.31.4 CVE: Not Available
Platform: Third Par
