So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
something similar to say Debian's option of "Standard Desktop"? For those
who
Hi,
> So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
> operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used
> on
> servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
> something similar to say Debian's option of "Standard Desktop"?
Sabeeh Baig wrote:
> So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
> operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
> servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
> something similar to say Debian's option of "Standar
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Sabeeh Baig wrote:
> So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
> operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
> servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
> something simi
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Sabeeh Baig wrote:
> So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
> operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
> servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
> something similar
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Sabeeh Baig wrote:
> So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
> operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
> servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
> something simila
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:54:51AM -0400, Sabeeh Baig wrote:
> So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
> operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
> servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
> something
Andrew Gould wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Sabeeh Baig wrote:
>> So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
>> operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
>> servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installat
Op woensdag 19 augustus 2009 09:18:15 schreef Steve Bertrand:
> Sabeeh Baig wrote:
> > So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
> > operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used
> > on servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a deskto
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:00:27PM +0200, beni wrote:
> Op woensdag 19 augustus 2009 09:18:15 schreef Steve Bertrand:
> > Sabeeh Baig wrote:
> > > So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
> > > operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used
>
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:57:21 -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> FreeBSD is the one that does let users have an option. One of
> those options is pcBSD. There are others who make up a bundle
> with FreeBSD as the base OS that already has your GUI and other
> things built for you -- a FreeBSD deskt
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:54:51AM -0400, Sabeeh Baig wrote:
> So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
> operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
> servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
> something
Sabeeh Baig wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
something similar to say Debian's option of "Standard Desk
13 matches
Mail list logo
