Ack, it looks like it would limp through doing the simple job wanted.
The good news is that I can make it work. The bad news is that it's
apparently so much simpler with the Linux iptables facilities. I can
see I have a bunch of reading to do before setting up to replace the
firewall machine.
Tha
"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which tool would be able to do this sort of thing best and how might it
> have been done.
PF has most of the bits you need built in, see eg
http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/en/bruteforce.html (part of a PF
tutorial).
For weeding out old table entries, you mig
From: "Erik Norgaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nce writeup. I do have one question at the bottom.
I used IPF on FBSD until there was some bug in IPF for 5.x some version
that forced me to switch after an upgrade. The bug has been fixed since
but I have found no reason to go back.
There are two th
--- Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> > --- Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Gable Barber wrote:
> >>> On 1/18/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Switch over to pf.
>
> >>> Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
> >>>
> >>> Hope I am not starting a
Peter wrote:
--- Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gable Barber wrote:
On 1/18/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Switch over to pf.
Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely interested in
the
opinions.
I used IPF on FBSD until there
--- Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gable Barber wrote:
> > On 1/18/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Switch over to pf.
> >>
> > Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
> >
> > Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely interested in
> the
> > opinions.
>
> I used I
On 1/18/06, Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gable Barber wrote:
> > On 1/18/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Switch over to pf.
> >>
> > Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
> >
> > Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely interested in the
> > opinions.
>
> I us
Gable Barber wrote:
On 1/18/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Switch over to pf.
Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely interested in the
opinions.
I used IPF on FBSD until there was some bug in IPF for 5.x some version
that forced me to
--- Gable Barber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/18/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Switch over to pf.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
All I can say is that I remember using ipf when I was on OpenBSD 2.9. At
3.0 it went to pf and ever since then I've been ex
On 1/18/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Switch over to pf.
>
>
>
>
Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely interested in the
opinions.
Gable
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
>
>
>
> Yes, incorrectly, if you have any rules with the log key word, then you
> can se if you get any entries in your log files. I would have default
> rules first in my rule set:
>
>block log in all
>block log out all
>
> And then pass what I positively know is good.
>
> Cheers, Erik
>
--- Gable Barber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy List...
> I am trying to figure out if ipf is running for certain. FreeBSD
> 6.0-RELEASE
> .
>
>
>
> I added the following to /etc/rc.conf :
>
> ipfilter_enable="YES"
> ipmon_enable="YES"
> ipmon_flags="-Dsvn"
> ipnat_enable="YES"
> ipfs_ena
Gable Barber wrote:
Howdy List...
I am trying to figure out if ipf is running for certain. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE
.
I added the following to /etc/rc.conf :
ipfilter_enable="YES"
ipmon_enable="YES"
ipmon_flags="-Dsvn"
ipnat_enable="YES"
ipfs_enable="YES"
I added a rule file /etc/ipf.conf , and f
ipf runs as a kernel module or compiled into the kernel you will never see
it running as a normal program you will know it is running by testing your
firewall to make sure it does what it was meant to do
> Howdy List...
> I am trying to figure out if ipf is running for certain. FreeBSD
> 6.0-RELEA
Howdy List...
I am trying to figure out if ipf is running for certain. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE
.
I added the following to /etc/rc.conf :
ipfilter_enable="YES"
ipmon_enable="YES"
ipmon_flags="-Dsvn"
ipnat_enable="YES"
ipfs_enable="YES"
I added a rule file /etc/ipf.conf , and flushed/reloaded ipf wi
15 matches
Mail list logo