Daniel Underwood wrote:
Thanks for the help.
I couldn't find any flags/fields in TCP packets indicated whether
encrypted (as in the case of SSH packets). There isn't any, right?
Correct: there isn't anything like that in the TCP headers. Encryption
on TCP streams is an application level thin
Daniel Underwood wrote:
> Thanks for the help.
>
> I couldn't find any flags/fields in TCP packets indicated whether
> encrypted (as in the case of SSH packets). There isn't any, right?
No. TCP (Transport Layer) knows nothing about encryption/encoding, and
hence there is no room (or need) within
Thanks for the help.
I couldn't find any flags/fields in TCP packets indicated whether
encrypted (as in the case of SSH packets). There isn't any, right?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
Daniel Underwood wrote:
Hi folks:
(1) I'm only used Wireshark and Ethereal to inspect network traffic,
and I've only used these on several occasion. Would someone suggest
FreeBSD alternatives (console or xserver based?
wireshark, formerly known as ethereal works just fine on FreeBSD. If you
Daniel Underwood wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> (1) I'm only used Wireshark and Ethereal to inspect network traffic,
> and I've only used these on several occasion. Would someone suggest
> FreeBSD alternatives (console or xserver based?
tcpdump(1). It can save to a pcap file for later review within Wire
Hi folks:
(1) I'm only used Wireshark and Ethereal to inspect network traffic,
and I've only used these on several occasion. Would someone suggest
FreeBSD alternatives (console or xserver based?
(2) I'm testing my connection to a remote server. The connection is
supposed to be encrypted. What's
