Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Fri, 30.01.2009 at 23:19:41 +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this
e
Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Fri, 30.01.2009 at 23:19:41 +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with thi
On Fri, 30.01.2009 at 23:19:41 +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
> and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
> firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this
> error message:
>
>
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:28 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Scot Hetzel wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:39 PM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> build-process, but I doubt this. I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary
>>> and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects.
>>> Interestingly, the firs
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Mel wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2009 15:39:03 O. Hartmann wrote:
Mel wrote:
On Friday 30 January 2009 13:19:41 O. Hartmann wrote:
After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new
xorg-7.4
and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package
,--- I/Alex (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:56:40 -0500) *
| All I was saying was that your ldd experiment was... hmm... not
| correct (if you agree with mine, of course).
,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:50:47 +0100) *
| Saying, it was stupid? You're correct. It was stupid and, of course, it
| doesn
Alex Goncharov wrote:
> ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:07:32 +0100) *
> | Alex Goncharov wrote:
> | > ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:39:03 +0100) *
> | > | I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary
> | > | and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects.
> | > | Interestingly, the
,--- You/Mel (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:05:50 -0900) *
| As a sidenote, it would be nice if xorg-server14 port would be created till
| the dust has settled.
Very, very nice.
Almost as nice as xorg-server being the old, working xorg-server and
xorg-server-devel the new, broken one.
-- Alex -- alex
,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:07:32 +0100) *
| Alex Goncharov wrote:
| > ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:39:03 +0100) *
| > | I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary
| > | and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects.
| > | Interestingly, the first three entries show up someth
Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:39 PM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
>
>> build-process, but I doubt this. I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary
>> and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects.
>> Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing -
>> therefore
Alex Goncharov wrote:
> ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:39:03 +0100) *
> | I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary
> | and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects.
> | Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing -
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox3 ldd
On Saturday 31 January 2009 15:39:03 O. Hartmann wrote:
> Mel wrote:
> > On Friday 30 January 2009 13:19:41 O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
> >> and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
> >> firefox3 still
,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:39:03 +0100) *
| I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary
| and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects.
| Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing -
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox3 ldd /usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-b
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:39 PM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> build-process, but I doubt this. I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary
> and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects.
> Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing -
> therefore I deinstalled Firefox and rebuil
Mel wrote:
> On Friday 30 January 2009 13:19:41 O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
>> and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
>> firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this
>>
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:23 -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote:
> ,--- You/O. (Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:19:41 +0100) *
> | After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
> | and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
> | firefox3 still doesn't work proper
,--- You/O. (Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:19:41 +0100) *
| After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
| and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
| firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this
| error message:
|
| Xlib
On Friday 30 January 2009 13:19:41 O. Hartmann wrote:
> After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
> and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
> firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this
> error message:
>
> Xli
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, O. Hartmann wrote:
After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this
error message:
Xlib: extension "Generic
After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this
error message:
Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0"
20 matches
Mail list logo
