On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 09:26:05AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
> > sorry: should have been "bounce back". when i responded to the
> > middle of
> > an on-going debate last night, i received an automated reply that my
> > post
> >
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
> sorry: should have been "bounce back". when i responded to the middle
> of
> an on-going debate last night, i received an automated reply that my
> post
> had to be approved because there were too many recipients to the
>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:00:37PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Gary Kline wrote:
> > i got a bizarre bouch back saying that my post from last night had to be
> > okayed.. like, say what:_)
>
> What?
>
sorry: should have been "bounce back". when i responded to the middle
of
Gary Kline wrote:
> i got a bizarre bouch back saying that my post from last night had to be
> okayed.. like, say what:_)
What?
Steve
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
i got a bizarre bouch back saying that my post from last night had to be
okayed.. like, say what:_)
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org
For FBSD list: http://transfinite.th
