On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:32:38PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
Jurjen Middendorp wrote:
If you're familiar with pdksh, are you also familiar with ksh93, which
is (I believe) Mr. Korn's own shell? If you are, I would be interessted
in your opinion of the two, any comparisons you might give.
I've
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:21:23PM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 04:13 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Hi Frank,
Now that you mention pdksh, have you tried mksh (in Ports too)?
I've installed it and successfully run moderately large ksh scripts
(like the
Jurjen Middendorp wrote:
If you're familiar with pdksh, are you also familiar with ksh93, which
is (I believe) Mr. Korn's own shell? If you are, I would be interessted
in your opinion of the two, any comparisons you might give.
I've never used ksh93 so I really can't say. There is a NOTES
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 19:38 +, Frank Shute wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:21:23PM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 04:13 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Hi Frank,
Now that you mention pdksh, have you tried mksh (in Ports too)?
I've installed it
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 04:13 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2007-12-14 21:10, Frank Shute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used bash for an interactive shell for about 5 years until I
discovered the goodness of pdksh. About half the size, statically
linked, not full of bugs and better editing
Tom McLaughlin wrote:
Now that you mention pdksh, have you tried mksh (in Ports too)?
I've installed it and successfully run moderately large ksh scripts
(like the webrev(1) utility of OpenSolaris), and it is about an order of
magnitude smaller than pdksh here:
% [EMAIL
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 22:26 -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
Tom McLaughlin wrote:
Now that you mention pdksh, have you tried mksh (in Ports too)?
I've installed it and successfully run moderately large ksh scripts
(like the webrev(1) utility of OpenSolaris), and it is about an order of
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:34:50PM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 22:26 -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
Tom McLaughlin wrote:
Now that you mention pdksh, have you tried mksh (in Ports too)?
I've installed it and successfully run moderately large ksh scripts
(like the
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 04:13:49AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2007-12-14 21:10, Frank Shute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used bash for an interactive shell for about 5 years until I
discovered the goodness of pdksh. About half the size, statically
linked, not full of bugs and better
On 2007-12-15 13:54, Frank Shute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ls -ld mksh bash ksh
% -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 684699 Dec 9 19:51 bash
% -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 2390645 Aug 31 17:07 ksh
% -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 236202 Dec 9 18:34 mksh
Wow.
On 2007-12-14 21:10, Frank Shute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used bash for an interactive shell for about 5 years until I
discovered the goodness of pdksh. About half the size, statically
linked, not full of bugs and better editing features. Plus it's not
GPL.
Hi Frank,
Now that you mention
11 matches
Mail list logo
