Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-08 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:58:41AM +, Frank Shute wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 09:24:15PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:05:17PM +, Frank Shute wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > >

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-07 Thread Frank Shute
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:03:12AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > Frank Shute wrote: > > > So if it's not branched but tagged, what's the difference between the > > ports tree I get if I use RELENG_4_8 compared to RELENG_7_0 as tags > > in my ports supfile? > > Probably not a very great de

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Frank Shute wrote: > So if it's not branched but tagged, what's the difference between the > ports tree I get if I use RELENG_4_8 compared to RELENG_7_0 as tags > in my ports supfile? Probably not a very great deal -- you'll get equally disappoin

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread 'Frank Shute'
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:34:50AM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: > > Thanks for your effort Fank, but unfortunately the Handbook shows that your > answer does not reflect the actual use of tags for fetching ports with > cvsup. Your answer triggers me to look for other places where information > can b

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Frank Shute
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 09:24:15PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:05:17PM +, Frank Shute wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection > > > and C

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:05:17PM +, Frank Shute wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, > > I wanted to CVSup the ports collection for the RELEASE 6.2. Stupidly usi

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Frank Shute
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: > > Hi > > Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, > I wanted to CVSup the ports collection for the RELEASE 6.2. Stupidly using > the wrong tag (tag=.), I erroneously but successfully installed the

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Predrag Punosevac
Erik Trulsson wrote: On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: Hi Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, I wanted to CVSup the ports collection for the RELEASE 6.2. Stupidly using the wrong tag (tag=.), I erroneously but successf

Re: port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:10:59PM +0100, Walter Jansen wrote: > Hi > > > > Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, > I wanted to CVSup the ports collection for the RELEASE 6.2. Stupidly using > the wrong tag (tag=.), I erroneously but successfully installed

port collection RELEASE6.2 lost after reinstall with CVSUP

2008-01-06 Thread Walter Jansen
Hi Upon reading chapters of the Handbook about the Ports collection and CVSup, I wanted to CVSup the ports collection for the RELEASE 6.2. Stupidly using the wrong tag (tag=.), I erroneously but successfully installed the CURRENT version. I could have used SYSINSTALL for the RELEASE 6.2 ports,