Re: procmail/formail syntax question

2005-10-23 Thread stan
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:28:49AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-10-23 19:53, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:25:30AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> Please do *not* remove the mailing list from the Cc: header, unless > >> there is a very good reason (

Re: procmail/formail syntax question

2005-10-23 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-10-23 19:53, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:25:30AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> Please do *not* remove the mailing list from the Cc: header, unless >> there is a very good reason (i.e. confidential information in the >> message text). > > Sorry, I hit "r"

Re: procmail/formail syntax question

2005-10-23 Thread stan
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:25:30AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Please do *not* remove the mailing list from the Cc: header, unless > there is a very good reason (i.e. confidential information in the > message text). > Sorry, I hit "r" instead of "l" in mutt. My apoligies. -- U.S. Encoura

Re: procmail/formail syntax question

2005-10-23 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-10-23 18:56, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:13:18AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2005-10-23 17:49, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 10:07:17PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:09:51PM -0400, stan wrote:

Re: procmail/formail syntax question

2005-10-23 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
Mon Oct 24 02:13:03 2005 % +++ newbox Mon Oct 24 02:20:05 2005 % @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ % for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:11:03 -0400 % Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:11:03 -0400 % From: stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> % -To: Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> % +To: [

Re: procmail/formail syntax question

2005-10-23 Thread stan
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:13:18AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-10-23 17:49, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 10:07:17PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > >>On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:09:51PM -0400, stan wrote: > >>> I'm trying to get procmail to rewrite the TO: he

Re: procmail/formail syntax question

2005-10-23 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-10-23 17:49, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 10:07:17PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: >>On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:09:51PM -0400, stan wrote: >>> I'm trying to get procmail to rewrite the TO: header. I've tried something >>> like: >>> >>> TO=`formail -xTo:` >> >> I th

Re: procmail/formail syntax question

2005-10-23 Thread stan
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 10:07:17PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:09:51PM -0400, stan wrote: > > I'm trying to get procmail to rewrite the TO: header. I've tried something > > like: > > > > TO=`formail -xTo:` > > I think this command is expanded only once, and gives an e

Re: procmail/formail syntax question

2005-10-23 Thread Roland Smith
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:09:51PM -0400, stan wrote: > I'm trying to get procmail to rewrite the TO: header. I've tried something > like: > > TO=`formail -xTo:` I think this command is expanded only once, and gives an empty string because you didn't give formail any input. > # is moved to "vir

procmail/formail syntax question

2005-10-23 Thread stan
I'm trying to get procmail to rewrite the TO: header. I've tried something like: TO=`formail -xTo:` # is moved to "viruses". :0: * ^X-Virus-Status: Yes | formail -I "To: is_virus, $TO" # Mails with a score of 15 or higher are almost certainly spam (with 0.05% # false positives according to rule