ruby ( final answer )

2004-02-26 Thread Michael Sharp
pkgdb is still looking for /usr/local/bin/ruby which after the upgrade dosent exist. Its now /usr/local/bin/ruby16 ln -s /usr/local/bin/ruby16 /usr/local/bin/ruby fixes pkgdb and portsdb michael ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o

Re: ruby ( final answer )

2004-02-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 10:54:21PM -0500, Michael Sharp wrote: > pkgdb is still looking for /usr/local/bin/ruby which after the upgrade > dosent exist. Its now /usr/local/bin/ruby16 > > ln -s /usr/local/bin/ruby16 /usr/local/bin/ruby > > fixes pkgdb and portsdb Did you report this to the portupg

Re: ruby ( final answer )

2004-02-26 Thread Shaun T. Erickson
Michael Sharp wrote: pkgdb is still looking for /usr/local/bin/ruby which after the upgrade dosent exist. Its now /usr/local/bin/ruby16 ln -s /usr/local/bin/ruby16 /usr/local/bin/ruby fixes pkgdb and portsdb I'm setting up a new 5.2.1-RELEASE system and was concerned about this, as I was about t

Re: ruby ( final answer )

2004-02-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:59:28PM -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: > Michael Sharp wrote: > > >pkgdb is still looking for /usr/local/bin/ruby which after the upgrade > >dosent exist. Its now /usr/local/bin/ruby16 > > > >ln -s /usr/local/bin/ruby16 /usr/local/bin/ruby > > > >fixes pkgdb and portsdb

Re: ruby ( final answer )

2004-02-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:13:54PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > > Probably not..the update to which you refer was committed earlier > > today. > > > > It looks like ruby has been updated to 1.8 and we have a situation like > gettext. I deleted ruby-* and portupgrade and reinstalled portupgrade.

Re: ruby ( final answer )

2004-02-26 Thread Kent Stewart
On Thursday 26 February 2004 09:15 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:13:54PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > Probably not..the update to which you refer was committed earlier > > > today. > > > > It looks like ruby has been updated to 1.8 and we have a situation > > like gettex

Re: ruby ( final answer )

2004-02-26 Thread Kent Stewart
On Thursday 26 February 2004 09:02 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:59:28PM -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: > > Michael Sharp wrote: > > >pkgdb is still looking for /usr/local/bin/ruby which after the > > > upgrade dosent exist. Its now /usr/local/bin/ruby16 > > > > > >ln -s /u

Re: ruby ( final answer )

2004-02-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 10:03:36PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Thursday 26 February 2004 09:15 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:13:54PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > Probably not..the update to which you refer was committed earlier > > > > today. > > > > > > It looks