:: Those packets are _supposed_ to get back to this host. That's
:: what loopback is for.
Yes, I think the RFCs make a point of this.
--
Juha
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:17:14AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 04:06:45PM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> > Misunderstood what Lamont was trying to show earlier... but he's right:
> > FreeBSD sends 127/8 out on the 'Net:
>
> I don't think FreeBSD is non-compliant for sending p
Hello all
Thank you all people for the hints. Now it works.
--
Regards
Martin Schweizer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PC-Service M. Schweizer; Gewerbehaus Schwarz; CH-8608 Bubikon
Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 04:06:45PM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> Misunderstood what Lamont was trying to show earlier... but he's right:
> FreeBSD sends 127/8 out on the 'Net:
I don't think FreeBSD is non-compliant for sending packets with
destination 127/8 out onto the net, but I guess it could
Misunderstood what Lamont was trying to show earlier... but he's right:
FreeBSD sends 127/8 out on the 'Net:
# ping 127.0.0.4
PING 127.0.0.4 (127.0.0.4): 56 data bytes
36 bytes from GE0-0-0.nzsx-core1.Auckland.telstra.net (203.98.4.3):
Destination Host Unreachable
Vr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL
:: FYI, RFC 990 is obsolete, the current version is RFC 1700:
:: 1700 Assigned Numbers. J. Reynolds, J. Postel. October 1994. (Format:
:: TXT=458860 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC1340) (Also STD0002)
:: (Status: US:)
:: (Status: STANDARD)
g) {127, }
Internal host loopback address
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 05:52:13PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Howdy. This question was originally framed as a "why doesn't
> uptime work for users in 4.4, when it used to in 4.3," but after looking
> into things further, it's now a "why is /dev/null set to mod 0600?" On
> a 4.3 system
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 06:01:48PM -0700, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> "Juha Saarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I thought about some of the things mentioned in that thread, and having
> > the ability to use some of the 127/8 addresses could actually be useful.
> > Is it possible to create
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 at 17:52:13 -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Howdy. This question was originally framed as a "why doesn't
> uptime work for users in 4.4, when it used to in 4.3," but after
> looking into things further, it's now a "why is /dev/null set to mod
> 0600?" On a 4.3 system th
"Juha Saarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought about some of the things mentioned in that thread, and having
> the ability to use some of the 127/8 addresses could actually be useful.
> Is it possible to create aliases for the loopback interface?
I'm not sure this is relevant, but I won
Howdy. This question was originally framed as a "why doesn't
uptime work for users in 4.4, when it used to in 4.3," but after looking
into things further, it's now a "why is /dev/null set to mod 0600?" On
a 4.3 system that I have, the perms on dev/null are 666.
I've chmod'ed all
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 02:35:43PM -0700, James Bucanek wrote:
> [Sun Sep 23 14:05:53 2001] [warn] Loaded DSO
> mod_jk-3.2.3/libexec/apache/mod_jk.so uses plain Apache 1.3 API, this
> module might crash under EAPI! (please recompile it with -DEAPI)
You need the EAPI also if you want to use mod_
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 01:24:49AM -0400, Kutulu wrote:
> Linux does have some company, though not very prestigious... from Win2k
> Professional:
>
> Pinging 127.1.2.3 with 32 bytes of data:
>
> Reply from 127.1.2.3: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
> Reply from 127.1.2.3: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 09:15:38AM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> :: I don't think any RFC actually calls for this, but 1122 is probably
> :: the relevant reference. From 3.2.1.3:
> :: (g) { 127, }
> ::
> :: Internal host loopback address. Addresses of this form
> :: MUST NOT appear o
14 matches
Mail list logo