Michal wrote:
> What is really odd is I see your replies but not my original post,
> how very strange??
One of your subscription options is whether you get your own posts
back.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 11:46:30AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> >
> > I am experiencing similar issues with newnfs:
> >
> > 1) I have two clients that each get around 0.5MiB/s to 2.6MiB/s
> > reading
> > from the NFS4-share on Gbit-Lan
> >
> > 2) Mounting with -t newnfs -o nfsv3 results in no pe
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:59:38PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> I don't tune anything with sysctl, I just use what I get from an
> install from CD onto i386 hardware. (I don't even bother to increase
> kern.ipc.maxsockbuf although I suggest that in the mount message.)
Sure. But maybe you don't
jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/09/2010 12:08 jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk said the following:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 09/01/10 15:08, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I'm running -STABLE with a kde-derived deskt
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:50:10 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Just be aware of this problem[1] when using it. (I've been working
> on a proper fix -- not a hack -- for the problem for about a week now.
> Stress level is very high given the ambiguous nature of many aspects
> of GEOM and libgeom lack
All-
It seems that something about the combination of FreeBSD 8.1 and
apcupsd connecting to an APC Back-UPS RS 1500.
Here's what I've got:
1. FreeBSD 8.1 (source compiled up to RELENG_8_1 for security fixes)
2. apcupsd 3.14.8 compiled from FreeBSD Ports
3. APC Back-UPS RS 1500
This was working f
my bad. it was a router firewall setting.
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 03:00:04PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
is it just me, or are all the cvsup servers down?
i've tried this on several machines, i can ping some of them (not
all), and the ones that can be pinged all timeout
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 10:08:38PM +0200, Michal Varga wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:03 -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
> > i just noticed this too... had a build going of qt-creator, and then
> > started a /usr/src make clean, and had to abort the qt-creator build to
> > get the make clean to fini
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:03 -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
> i just noticed this too... had a build going of qt-creator, and then
> started a /usr/src make clean, and had to abort the qt-creator build to
> get the make clean to finish. it was taking forever to even paint the
> xterm in the make clea
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 03:00:04PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
> is it just me, or are all the cvsup servers down?
>
> i've tried this on several machines, i can ping some of them (not
> all), and the ones that can be pinged all timeout when doing a make
> update in /usr/src.
It's just you. Timesta
is it just me, or are all the cvsup servers down?
i've tried this on several machines, i can ping some of them (not all),
and the ones that can be pinged all timeout when doing a make update in
/usr/src.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
h
i just noticed this too... had a build going of qt-creator, and then
started a /usr/src make clean, and had to abort the qt-creator build to
get the make clean to finish. it was taking forever to even paint the
xterm in the make clean window.
-stable built as of last week, amd64 kernel, core
On 09/03/2010 04:25, Michal wrote:
> What is really odd is I see your replies but not my original post, how
> very strange??
>
> Thank you for all of your assistance. I would like to move to being able
> to build a cheap san-like storage area for a DB, I don't know how well
> it would work but I'd
What is really odd is I see your replies but not my original post, how
very strange??
Thank you for all of your assistance. I would like to move to being able
to build a cheap san-like storage area for a DB, I don't know how well
it would work but I'd like to try it anyway since things like HP
On 2 Sep, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:56:04PM -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
>> [regarding getting more disks in a machine]
>> An inexpensive option are SATA port replicators. Think SATA switch or
>> hub. 1:4 is common and cheap.
>>
>> I have a motherboard with intel I
15 matches
Mail list logo
