Re: Intel c602 chipset support?

with sysinstall needing to re-scan devices to see the drives (but that's a sysinstall bug, see the other thread for details). Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 ---___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http

RE: FreeBSD 8.3-R sysinstall does not see disks that are recognized during boot

know it existed. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Intel c602 chipset support?

Hi there, Does anybody know if there are plans to support the Intel c602 chipset any time soon? Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

FreeBSD 8.3-R sysinstall does not see disks that are recognized during boot

with the SATA set to IDE, AHCI, and RAID modes. (The drives were recognized as da0 and da1 during bootup in all three modes, but not by sysinstall.) Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing

Why doesn't this startup script execute on boot?

8.0-STABLE #2: Wed May 12 13:28:18 EDT 2010) Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: Why doesn't this startup script execute on boot?

On Wed, 12 May 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi-- On May 12, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Andy Dills wrote: I'm working on getting p0f integrated with amavisd-new. Everything is great, with the exception that I can't get the neccessary commands to execute on boot. The amavid-p0fanalyzer script

Re: PPP doesn't set the correct interface in 7-STABLE

On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Mike Tancsa wrote: At 10:16 AM 8/6/2008, Andy Dills wrote: I'm trying to setup pptpd to enable VPN connections. This worked well in all versions of FreeBSD prior to 7. I would turf pptpd and look at mpd51 from the ports. It is far, far better maintained and is quite

PPP doesn't set the correct interface in 7-STABLE

, and #1 isn't clear to me. I tried a couple of different configurations and the interface never seems to get set correctly. Suggestions? Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing

Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0?

, and given the significant potential for optimization of existing IPv4 space both via technology and financial incentive, I see a minimum of five years before IPv6 is common. In the meantime, I'd like to only enable IPv6 on IPv6 enabled networks. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net

Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0?

piuzzled - why isn't ipv6_enabled=NO sufficient ? That's what I do on IPv4 networks and it works fine for me. That's actually a good point. I've had a hard time shedding my trim everything I don't use out of the kernel mentality over the years. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682

Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0?

. It will almost certainly travel over IPv6 for at least one hop. s/IPv6/uucp/ ;) Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

Re: What's new on the 127.0.0/24 block in 7?

every address within the subnet, however when binding addresses to an interface, the subnet mask merely controls which addresses are reachable locally on layer 2. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd-stable

INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0?

' Is this intended and/or a known issue? Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: What's new on the 127.0.0/24 block in 7?

as an alias to lo0 with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.255, and I was able to bind/listen/accept on it with no problem. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: What's new on the 127.0.0/24 block in 7?

the additional loopback instances BTW, /etc/netstart is a nice shortcut to avoid fatfingering an ifconfig. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Possibility for FreeBSD 4.11 Extended Support

before jumping to the 6 line, but 6.2 is looking pretty solid for my purposes, so it seems like a great time to start migrating. I'm curious if anybody else is planning to migrate a large number of 4-STABLE boxes to 6-STABLE as of 6.2-R. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972

Re: Suggestions for Adaptec SAS AIC9410

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Scott Long wrote: Doug White wrote: On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Andy Dills wrote: I'm trying to get a Supermicro 6024H-32R setup with 6.1, but I'm discovering that the Adaptec SAS AIC9410 controller isn't yet supported. I see one brief thread about

Suggestions for Adaptec SAS AIC9410

...is anybody using this in production? I'd prefer to use FreeBSD, but I'm guessing I'm going to need to do SuSE for this box, which Adaptec provides drivers for. Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ freebsd