kldload amr_linux did the trick for me, thanks!
Cheers,
B
> Boris Samorodov writes:
> | On Tue, 9 May 2006 12:37:43 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote:
> | > PS - mknod c 254 /compat/linux/dev/megadev0 (which is what the device
> is
> | > under linux) doesn't help :(
>
PS - mknod c 254 /compat/linux/dev/megadev0 (which is what the device is
under linux) doesn't help :(
>
>> On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, duh, it's been so long since I used linux binary emulation that I
>>>
> On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote:
>
>> Oh, duh, it's been so long since I used linux binary emulation that I
>> forgot all about brandelf... Thanks Michael!
>
>> ... But now that the binary is properly branded, I get a different
>&
else
I've tried... (and I know for a fact that TERM=xterm works on my linux
machines)... Any ideas?
Cheers,
Brian
> Brian Szymanski wrote:
>> Hi...
>>
>> I saw this in the 6.1 release notes and eagerly upgraded:
>> "The amr(4) driver now supports ioctl(2) requ
, BIOS G119, 64MB RAM
...
amr0: delete logical drives supported by controller
amrd0: on amr0
amrd0: 953656MB (1953087488 sectors) RAID 5 (optimal)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/src/megaraid]# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
15 0xc040 504e7c kernel
21 0xc4bc2000 1a000linux.ko
Brian
e with that card's drivers
and would be happy to raise any other issues you may be seeing.
>>
>> Aside from the that we have had good experiences with Areca card.
>>
>> Steve
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Brian Szymanski" <[EMAIL
ey are also probably not too cheap, but I have been very happy
> with the 3Ware SATA card. 3Ware has been very good at support for
> FreeBSD and the management tool (3DM2) is in ports.
> --
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
> Ernest O. Lawre
om/english/product/pci/rz_sata_8/8586rz_e.htm
>
> Expensive? Yes.
>
> Fast, reliable, cheap - pick any two ;-)
In my case, I'm actually shooting for reliable and (relatively) cheap :)
Fast is nice but I don't much care, so the megaraids look slightly better
than this product, b
s have had
good luck with? I've been happy with the megaraid series on linux at my
job, but I'm wondering if the management utilities are there on freebsd,
etc.
Thanks in advance...
Brian Szymanski
Software and Systems Developer
Media Matters for Amer
upgrade from vinum on 5.3 to gvinum on 6-STABLE without a dump/restore?
I probably won't do this out of paranoia, but am curious if it's possible.
Thanks again and cheers,
Brian
Brian Szymanski
Software and Systems Developer
Media
inum create again.
Would I have better luck compiling gvinum into the kernel instead of
loading the module? What do other folks who have successful config's do?
Thanks in advance,
Brian
Brian Szymanski
Software and Systems Developer
Media Matters for America
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vinum.r5.cf
Des
rather unhappily, to stick with 4.x and some early 5.x
releases b/c vinum is critical for me... Any advice would be greatly
appreciated.
Brian Szymanski
Software and Systems Developer
Media Matters for America
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
;s really confused
about the new card?
I'm running 5.3-p15 (can't go to 5.4, because I need vinum R5 to at least
partially work! sigh...)
Thanks in advance,
Brian Szymanski
Software and Systems Developer
Media Matters for America
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
d?
I don't see it in hardware-i386.html, but generic ata cards have worked
for me in the past - was I just been getting lucky before?
Thanks for any ideas.
Cheers,
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Does this mean my snapshots are being overwritten on the target disk? And
if so, that's a good thing, right?
Cheers,
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
>>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Szymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Brian> Actually I experienced a number of bugs with vinum in 5.3 that
> Brian> proved fatal to a root vinum install (in fact, everything on
> Brian> the second ATA channel
>>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Szymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> That is not completely fair for vinum
>>>
>>> I've been running vinum now for the better of 3-4 years, and even
>>> with a set of very flaky sea
vinum stop working in favor of gvinum? is it with 5.3?
Could I expect 5.2.1 to work? Pardon the barrage of questions, but it
would take me hours to test each case, so if anyone knows, drop me a line.
Thanks!
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
ANUALLY
---
THE FOLLOWING FILE SYSTEM HAD AN UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY:
ufs: /dev/gvinum/big (/home)
Automatic file system check failed; help!
Pulling power on the RAID0/RAID1 arrays I have does what I expect it to
do... Anyone have any idea what's going
__
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
--
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
've never used Raid-5 before... If there are known
bugs, I'd appreciate someone sending me a link to where I can read more.
Cheers,
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
64m54.298s
user52m56.915s
sys 9m13.041s
make -j2 buildworld:
real67m55.816s
user56m20.778s
sys 10m20.247s
make -j3 buildworld:
real70m53.936s
user59m2.447s
sys 10m43.325s
make -j4 buildworld:
real72m25.904s
user60m19.098s
sys 10m59.492s
--
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
This thread needs to die.
The speed of light has nothing to do with this mailing list, period.
Let this be the last post to it.
Thank you!
Cheers,
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gregory Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wri
me.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Ricardo Oliva
> Core Systems Administrator
> Zoology Department
> University of British Columbia
> Ph.: 604-822-3882
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 17-Nov-04, at 1:21 PM, Brian Szymanski wrote:
>
>> Hi, I
.x machines - everytime I cvsup portupgrade wants to
generate an INDEX.tmp before it doesn anything... But the real problem is
the segfault with ruby, which can be reliably reproduced ad infinitum.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
--
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I prefer pgp encrypted email
single access.
Recovery is trivial when drive C or D goes. Since drives C and D form one
raid-5 volume together, just chuck both drives and replace the makeshift
drive with a new 200G drive. I am aware of and don't care about the
performance hit.
Cheers,
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
which is less surprising. Does anyone
know of another way to accomplish the same thing (Raid5 over two disks and
2 half sized disks concatenated together?) or a similar result?
Any help would be most appreciated.
Cheers,
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:53:00AM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 11:10, Brian Szymanski wrote:
> > I'm having some trouble setting the (read-only) sysctl value kern.ngroups.
>
> Raising the maximum number of groups requires changes all over
at value
should I choose? I've also tried 128 with no success, and am working my
way down to 16, but I'm not sure if I trust the kernel that I might get by
compiling in such a way...
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for reading,
Brian Szymanski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To U
29 matches
Mail list logo
