https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
--- Comment #20 from Rodney W. Grimes ---
(In reply to D. Ebdrup from comment #18)
And has a 90+% chance of breaking again when 11.3 is release, this is a general
issue being address by some other means that are not yet in place. Either
sp
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
Jan Jurkus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@gcecad-service.nl
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
D. Ebdrup changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debd...@gmail.com
--- Comment #18 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
--- Comment #17 from rkober...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dennis Clarke from comment #15)
just tried this and I need to slightly modify the instructions:
$ svnlite update -r 469570 /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod
$ svn update -r 469
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
--- Comment #16 from rkober...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dennis Clarke from comment #15)
Now I am completely baffled. I just checked the archive and there was never a
5.2.12_1. I see no way that the package virtualbox-ose-5.2.12_1 could exi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
--- Comment #15 from Dennis Clarke ---
(In reply to rkoberman from comment #12)
virtualbox-ose has been a real pain to deal with for the last few weeks
here. At least for me and my team of sysadmins who are doing experiments
with FreeBSD
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
--- Comment #14 from rkober...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #13)
I will open a bug report on this. I will admit that I never read the Errata
item. I just made foolish assumptions. Sigh.
Looking forward to three week
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
--- Comment #13 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to rkoberman from comment #12)
The text from comment 10 was copied verbatim from the published 11.2-RELEASE
Errata notes. If the instructions are incorrect (or incomplete), please re-open
th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
--- Comment #12 from rkober...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #10)
No, virtualbox-ose is not the problem and there is no reason to build it. It is
virtualbox-ose-kmod that requires a build against an 11.2-RELEASE kerne
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
Dennis Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcla...@blastwave.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Version|11.1-STA
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
m...@janh.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@janh.de
--- Comment #9 from m..
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
rkober...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rkober...@gmail.com
--- Comme
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
--- Comment #7 from Eric van Gyzen ---
At the very least, this needs special mention in the release notes.
Maybe the release notes could suggest that users change their configuration to
avoid loading these modules until their packages have
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rgri...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
--- Comment #5 from Ka Ho Ng ---
Below is one of the suspected change that causes KBI breakage, as
vm_map_min/max/pmap are inline helpers before being made non-inline by
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=332091 :
https
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228535
Ka Ho Ng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sta...@freebsd.org
--
You are receivin
17 matches
Mail list logo
