* John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080604 11:12] wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:04:18 pm Peter Jeremy wrote:
BTW, your MUA's list-reply configuration don't recognize that
freebsd-stable@ and stable@ are aliases.
Yes, kmail is broken and the authors refuse to fix it. It happens on reply
On Thursday 05 June 2008 02:19:31 am Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080604 11:12] wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:04:18 pm Peter Jeremy wrote:
BTW, your MUA's list-reply configuration don't recognize that
freebsd-stable@ and stable@ are aliases.
Yes,
* John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080605 07:58] wrote:
On Thursday 05 June 2008 02:19:31 am Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080604 11:12] wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:04:18 pm Peter Jeremy wrote:
BTW, your MUA's list-reply configuration don't recognize that
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:04:18 pm Peter Jeremy wrote:
BTW, your MUA's list-reply configuration don't recognize that
freebsd-stable@ and stable@ are aliases.
Yes, kmail is broken and the authors refuse to fix it. It happens on reply to
a foo@ e-mail (it changes the 'To' to 'freebsd-foo@'
I have an on-going problem with DigiBoard Xem boards causing interrupt
storms (since 4.x days). The FreeBSD driver polls the board and
doesn't have a functional interrupt handler (and Linux behaves in the
same way). It seems that under some conditions, the board will assert
its interrupt line
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:08:40 am Peter Jeremy wrote:
I have an on-going problem with DigiBoard Xem boards causing interrupt
storms (since 4.x days). The FreeBSD driver polls the board and
doesn't have a functional interrupt handler (and Linux behaves in the
same way). It seems that under
On 2008-Jun-03 10:21:35 -0400, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the past, I have managed to avoid the problem by putting the Digi
card on a dedicated interrupt. For reasons I don't understand, this
appears to mask the problem.
That is because we leave interrupts masked until it gets
