Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-29 Thread Chris
I mean them downloading from the psybnc website and installing from that tarball, I guess an option I can provide is to compile from ports and make some sort of script to install the binaries to the user's dir. Chris On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:10:53 +1300, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-29 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:45:27AM +, Chris wrote: > I am talking about the psybnc source because its for users on the > server who cannot compile software from ports. If they can't compile from ports, then they certainly won't be able to install it; won't that mean that they won't be able to

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-28 Thread Chris
I am talking about the psybnc source because its for users on the server who cannot compile software from ports. Chris On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:03:05 -0800 (PST), Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:48:01AM -0800, Rob w

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-27 Thread Rob
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:48:01AM -0800, Rob wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > There seems to be a bug with the gcc version of > 5.3 > > STABLE (gcc 3.4.2), when using: > > > > #define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG > > #define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC > > What are

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-27 Thread Gunther Nikl
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:42:11AM +, Chris wrote: > I then decided to try psybnc myself and this is what happens using > gcc 3.4.2 bundled with 5.3. > > Initializing bouncer compilation > [*] Running Conversion Tool for older psyBNC Data. > tools/convconf.c: In function `cofile': > tools/conv

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 12:17:37AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:42:11AM +, Chris wrote: > > Well it started out with me getting a complaint from a user on my > > server saying he couldnt compile psybnc since I upgraded to 5.3 I told > > him I would investigate when I

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:42:11AM +, Chris wrote: > Well it started out with me getting a complaint from a user on my > server saying he couldnt compile psybnc since I upgraded to 5.3 I told > him I would investigate when I get time, I then found out later that > ezbounce also failed (i use ez

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-26 Thread Chris
Well it started out with me getting a complaint from a user on my server saying he couldnt compile psybnc since I upgraded to 5.3 I told him I would investigate when I get time, I then found out later that ezbounce also failed (i use ezbounce) on 5.3, but my binary which was backed up from when I c

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-26 Thread Björn König
Chris schrieb: there is also a bug which prevents compiling of ezbounce and psybnc, I wonder how much testing went into the new gcc compiler or was it just bundled into the release, considering this is the reccommended release for production server's now this is a bad oversight, I think the gcc sho

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:48:01AM -0800, Rob wrote: > > Hi, > > There seems to be a bug with the gcc version of 5.3 > STABLE (gcc 3.4.2), when using: > > #define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG > #define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC What are those? FreeBSD doesn't use GLIBC, so how do you know it's a FreeBSD b

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:03:28PM +, Chris wrote: > there is also a bug which prevents compiling of ezbounce and psybnc, I > wonder how much testing went into the new gcc compiler or was it just > bundled into the release, considering this is the reccommended release > for production server's

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-26 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Wednesday, 26. January 2005 13:03, Chris wrote: > there is also a bug which prevents compiling of ezbounce and psybnc, I > wonder how much testing went into the new gcc compiler or was it just > bundled into the release, considering this is the reccommended release > for production server's now

Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-26 Thread Chris
there is also a bug which prevents compiling of ezbounce and psybnc, I wonder how much testing went into the new gcc compiler or was it just bundled into the release, considering this is the reccommended release for production server's now this is a bad oversight, I think the gcc should be changed

Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable

2005-01-26 Thread Rob
Hi, There seems to be a bug with the gcc version of 5.3 STABLE (gcc 3.4.2), when using: #define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG #define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC I discovered this when compiling the LyX sources, and the LyX mailing list pointed out that this is gcc/OS FreeBSD issue. The linking ends with err