On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:34:19PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Tor Egge wrote:
>
> > I'm enclosed a patch that introduces PADDR2/PMAP2 which is to be used
> > by pmap_pte() (should not be called from interrupts on noncurrent
> > pmaps) while pmap_pte_quick() (should
> >> So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9:
> >>
> >> WARNING!
> >>
> >> Do not attempt to stress a FreeBSD 4.9 machine if you:
> >
> >or "Upgrade your FreeBSD to RedHat".
>
> s/RedHat/FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE/
>
> >It's simple: we need to backout all these untested MFCs.
>
> Or fix the
> At 11:42 PM 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> >It's simple: we need to backout all these untested MFCs.
>
> I dont think people throw in untested MFCs into STABLE. They do their best
> effort and with that, there will still be some bugs. Its that simple.
Well, we all have diffe
At 11:42 PM 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
It's simple: we need to backout all these untested MFCs.
I dont think people throw in untested MFCs into STABLE. They do their best
effort and with that, there will still be some bugs. Its that simple.
---Mike
__
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 12:56-0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> At 23:42 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> >On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 13:34-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > > So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9:
> > >
> > > WARNING!
> > >
> > > Do not attempt to stress a FreeBSD 4.9 mac
At 23:42 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 13:34-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9:
>
> WARNING!
>
> Do not attempt to stress a FreeBSD 4.9 machine if you:
or "Upgrade your FreeBSD to RedHat".
s/RedHat/FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE/
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 13:34-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> > Ah, that's a good idea!
> >
> > I'll try setting hw.physmem down to 12M or so and see if that causes the
> > panics to occur over here.
> >
> > Mike "Silby" Silbersack
>
> Ok, I booted wit
At 01:34 PM 27/08/2003 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
Ok, I booted with hw.physmem="16M", and a buildworld paniced with
"free/cache page dirty". (I was taking a nap at the time the buildworld
crashed, we'll talk about that soon.)
(Are you guys running with INVARIANTS?)
Nope, I am not. Should I be
RAM is cheap, so I don't need swapping.
Naps are -not- negotiable.
:)
- Mike H.
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:34:15 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> Ah, that's a good idea!
>
> I'll try setting hw.physmem down to 12M or so and see if that causes the
> panics to occur over here.
>
> Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Ok, I booted with hw.physmem="16M", and a buildworld paniced with
"free/cache page dirty".
10 matches
Mail list logo