Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-30 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:34:19PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Tor Egge wrote: > > > I'm enclosed a patch that introduces PADDR2/PMAP2 which is to be used > > by pmap_pte() (should not be called from interrupts on noncurrent > > pmaps) while pmap_pte_quick() (should

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-28 Thread John Hay
> >> So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9: > >> > >> WARNING! > >> > >> Do not attempt to stress a FreeBSD 4.9 machine if you: > > > >or "Upgrade your FreeBSD to RedHat". > > s/RedHat/FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE/ > > >It's simple: we need to backout all these untested MFCs. > > Or fix the

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread David G. Lawrence
> At 11:42 PM 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > >It's simple: we need to backout all these untested MFCs. > > I dont think people throw in untested MFCs into STABLE. They do their best > effort and with that, there will still be some bugs. Its that simple. Well, we all have diffe

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 11:42 PM 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: It's simple: we need to backout all these untested MFCs. I dont think people throw in untested MFCs into STABLE. They do their best effort and with that, there will still be some bugs. Its that simple. ---Mike __

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 12:56-0700, Colin Percival wrote: > At 23:42 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > >On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 13:34-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9: > > > > > > WARNING! > > > > > > Do not attempt to stress a FreeBSD 4.9 mac

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Colin Percival
At 23:42 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 13:34-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9: > > WARNING! > > Do not attempt to stress a FreeBSD 4.9 machine if you: or "Upgrade your FreeBSD to RedHat". s/RedHat/FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE/

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 13:34-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > Ah, that's a good idea! > > > > I'll try setting hw.physmem down to 12M or so and see if that causes the > > panics to occur over here. > > > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack > > Ok, I booted wit

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 01:34 PM 27/08/2003 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: Ok, I booted with hw.physmem="16M", and a buildworld paniced with "free/cache page dirty". (I was taking a nap at the time the buildworld crashed, we'll talk about that soon.) (Are you guys running with INVARIANTS?) Nope, I am not. Should I be

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Mike Harding
RAM is cheap, so I don't need swapping. Naps are -not- negotiable. :) - Mike H. X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:34:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Mike Silbersack wrote: > Ah, that's a good idea! > > I'll try setting hw.physmem down to 12M or so and see if that causes the > panics to occur over here. > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack Ok, I booted with hw.physmem="16M", and a buildworld paniced with "free/cache page dirty".