Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage

2007-10-16 Thread Peter Jeremy
In the last episode (Oct 14), Artem Kuchin said: Maybe someone with deeper knowledge of the internals of FreeBSD can clean up something for me (any for many others)^ Here are lines from my top: PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 9258 hordelo_ru1

Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage, now threads

2007-10-16 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2007-Oct-15 12:43:39 -0400, William LeFebvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whether there is actual swapping going on or not, processes will still need swap space. There needs to be a backing store for every page that's in physical memory. This isn't true for FreeBSD. You can even totally

Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage

2007-10-15 Thread William LeFebvre
Artem Kuchin wrote: Hello! Maybe someone with deeper knowledge of the internals of FreeBSD can clean up something for me (any for many others)^ Here are lines from my top: PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 9258 hordelo_ru1 40 40992K 4260K

Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage

2007-10-15 Thread Artem Kuchin
William LeFebvre wrote: Artem Kuchin wrote: Hello! Maybe someone with deeper knowledge of the internals of FreeBSD can clean up something for me (any for many others)^ Here are lines from my top: PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 9258 hordelo_ru1

Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage, now threads

2007-10-15 Thread William LeFebvre
Artem Kuchin wrote: CPU is more than just enough in my case. There will a a lot https sitting there but load, i am sure, will be low. If the load is low then you may not need very many processes. Swapping is simply unacceptable, so i am counting only real physical ram. Whether there is

Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage, now threads

2007-10-15 Thread Artem Kuchin
William LeFebvre wrote: Artem Kuchin wrote: CPU is more than just enough in my case. There will a a lot https sitting there but load, i am sure, will be low. If the load is low then you may not need very many processes. They belong to different sites ;) so they need to be run constantly and

Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage

2007-10-15 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* William LeFebvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071015 06:49] wrote: Unfortunately, freebsd does not appear to track the amount of shared virtual memory for each process. It could be obtained by walking through all the pages in a process's vm map, but that would really slow top down. I don't know

Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage

2007-10-15 Thread Clifton Royston
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:08:36PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * William LeFebvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071015 06:49] wrote: Unfortunately, freebsd does not appear to track the amount of shared virtual memory for each process. It could be obtained by walking through all the pages in a

Question about 'top' values on memory usage

2007-10-14 Thread Artem Kuchin
Hello! Maybe someone with deeper knowledge of the internals of FreeBSD can clean up something for me (any for many others)^ Here are lines from my top: PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 9258 hordelo_ru1 40 40992K 4260K accept 0 0:00 0.00%

Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage

2007-10-14 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 14), Artem Kuchin said: Maybe someone with deeper knowledge of the internals of FreeBSD can clean up something for me (any for many others)^ Here are lines from my top: PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 9258 hordelo_ru1