Re: bind9 trouble in -PRERELEASE

2006-11-01 Thread Nguyen Tam Chinh
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:40:39PM +0300, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote: I don't think that I can do a stack backtrace when named left no core after that. No core is being left either due to limits (limit/ulimit) being imposed on the user or group 'bind', o

Re: bind9 trouble in -PRERELEASE

2006-11-01 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:40:39PM +0300, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote: > I don't think that I can do a stack backtrace when named left no core > after that. No core is being left either due to limits (limit/ulimit) being imposed on the user or group 'bind', or because chroot precautions are being used

Re: bind9 trouble in -PRERELEASE

2006-11-01 Thread Nguyen Tam Chinh
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Mark Andrews wrote: Hello, I have a server with busy local DNS (bind 9.3.2-P1, listen on localhost). The bind9 got strange problem and gone away for the last some days: Oct 31 11:34:49 cat9 named[500]: /usr/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/mem.c:628: INSIST

Re: bind9 trouble in -PRERELEASE

2006-11-01 Thread Mark Andrews
> Hello, > > I have a server with busy local DNS (bind 9.3.2-P1, listen on localhost). > The bind9 got strange problem and gone away for the last some days: > > Oct 31 11:34:49 cat9 named[500]: > /usr/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/mem.c:628: > INSIST(((unsigned char *)mem >

bind9 trouble in -PRERELEASE

2006-11-01 Thread Nguyen Tam Chinh
Hello, I have a server with busy local DNS (bind 9.3.2-P1, listen on localhost). The bind9 got strange problem and gone away for the last some days: Oct 31 11:34:49 cat9 named[500]: /usr/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/mem.c:628: INSIST(((unsigned char *)mem )[size] == 0xbe)