Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net80211 ieee80211.c ieee80211_input.c ieee80211_ioctl.c ieee80211_node.c ieee80211_node.h ieee80211_output.c ieee80211_proto.c ieee80211_proto.h ieee80211_var.h src/sys/dev/ath if_ath.c src/sys/dev/ipw if_ipw.c ...

2005-08-13 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:11:52PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >The ipw and iwi drivers (at least) have never worked right so far as > >I can tell. At one point I tried the iwi driver and it kinda worked > >but failed in many common scenarios

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net80211 ieee80211.c ieee80211_input.c ieee80211_ioctl.c ieee80211_node.c ieee80211_node.h ieee80211_output.c ieee80211_proto.c ieee80211_proto.h ieee80211_var.h src/sys/dev/ath if_ath.c src/sys/dev/ipw if_ipw.c ...

2005-08-13 Thread dmp
Quoting Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The ipw and iwi drivers (at least) have never worked right so far as I can tell. At one point I tried the iwi driver and it kinda worked but failed in many common scenarios and in general was very fragile. I no longer have the facilities to even test

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net80211 ieee80211.c ieee80211_input.c ieee80211_ioctl.c ieee80211_node.c ieee80211_node.h ieee80211_output.c ieee80211_proto.c ieee80211_proto.h ieee80211_var.h src/sys/dev/ath if_ath.c src/sys/dev/ipw if_ipw.c ...

2005-08-13 Thread Sam Leffler
Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Saturday 13 August 2005 14:27, Sam Leffler wrote: [Not sure why you're sending this to cvs-all] Oops, freebsd-stable@ is probably better. Not really, but whatever. Daniel O'Connor wrote: ipw is still broken [for me].. Sorry but that wasn't the question.

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net80211 ieee80211.c ieee80211_input.c ieee80211_ioctl.c ieee80211_node.c ieee80211_node.h ieee80211_output.c ieee80211_proto.c ieee80211_proto.h ieee80211_var.h src/sys/dev/ath if_ath.c src/sys/dev/ipw if_ipw.c ...

2005-08-13 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Saturday 13 August 2005 14:27, Sam Leffler wrote: > [Not sure why you're sending this to cvs-all] Oops, freebsd-stable@ is probably better. > Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > ipw is still broken [for me].. > > Sorry but that wasn't the question. I don't believe the commit you are > responding to ch