packet loss with re(4) - fixed on 6.4-R

2008-03-01 Thread Dan Langille
I'm happy to say that the packet loss I experienced with re(4) on 6.3-RELEASE has been fixed by a patch provided off list by Pyun YongHyeon. I'm also happy to report that the same hardware does not exhibit any re(4) problems with 7.0-RELEASE. ref:

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-28 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:18:26 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After the last update, I saw that there had been a lot of fixes for re (4) in the source, so I didn't bother with this patch.The machine is still up, but I haven't tried any heavy network traffic yet. Note to self

Re[2]: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-25 Thread Daniel Gerzo
Hello Pyun, Monday, February 25, 2008, 3:01:23 AM, you wrote: Perhaps the recent MFC's for re helps? see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c I have just upgraded my machine[1] to the latest 7-stable,so it is still too early to tell if re(4) is stable now.

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-25 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:22:51AM +0100, Daniel Gerzo wrote: Hello Pyun, Monday, February 25, 2008, 3:01:23 AM, you wrote: Perhaps the recent MFC's for re helps? see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c I have just upgraded my machine[1] to

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-25 Thread Pete French
Unfortunately 7-stable does not have latest fixes for re(4). For 7-stable or 7.0-RELEASE use the following files. http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/7.0R/if_re.c http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/7.0R/if_rlreg.h Ah, thats is very interesting - I have an identical motherboard to Tor,

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-25 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hi! Everybody, I *am* subscribed to the list, there is no need to CC me at all. Doing sio just clutters up my mail sorting. :-) On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:50:09 + Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, thats is very interesting - I have an identical motherboard to Tor, and am also having

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-25 Thread Pete French
I couldn't see anyone lese in this thread whos name starts with Tor... so I guess you were adressing me. Ah, yes, sorry, not quite sure how I lost the end of your name there! I used this patch http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.patch and it worled well for me. Thanks for this,

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-24 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:55:06PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:44:49 -0500 Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss (sometimes 85%). If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with

packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-23 Thread Dan Langille
With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss (sometimes 85%). If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with similar tests (ping -c 100). re0: RealTek 8168/8111B PCIe Gigabit Ethernet port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xf9fff000-0xf9ff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci1

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-23 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:44:49 -0500 Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss (sometimes 85%). If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with similar tests (ping -c 100). Perhaps the recent MFC's for re helps? see