-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can the vlan "vlandev" be a lagg port of multiple physical interfaces
(for redundancy)?
//Svein
- --
- +---+---
/"\ |Svein Skogen | sv...@d80.iso100.no
\ / |Solberg Østli 9| PGP Ke
Jeff,
On 15 aug 2009, at 05:04, Jeff Richards wrote:
(da6:umass-sim6:6:0:0): SYNCHRONIZE CACHE(10). CDB: 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
...
I've had lots of stability issues with USB drives until I added some
quirks to prevent the SYNCHRONIZE CACHE from happening. For example:
Index: cam/scsi/scsi
debug.sizeof.g_geom: 68
--- On Sat, 8/15/09, Jeff Richards wrote:
From: Jeff Richards
Subject: Re: Multiple USB drives stability question
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Saturday, August 15, 2009, 10:50 AM
I am now trying to rsync large files from the 320GB gmirror+gjournal device to
the 2nd 1TB
idle while the
source providers are still reporting 100% active.
Is there any tuning I should be investigating for these GEOM classes?
--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Jeff Richards wrote:
From: Jeff Richards
Subject: Re: Multiple USB drives stability question
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Friday
/49273a95d669d784 removed.
fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.8
GEOM_LABEL: Label ufsid/4a509cddbd500a7e removed.
--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Jeff Richards wrote:
From: Jeff Richards
Subject: Multiple USB drives stability question
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 8:19 P
Is there a practical limit on the number of active USB drives with FreeBSD?
I've had stability issues using multiple USB drives as storage.
My initial design goal was cheap, hot-swappable storage. I am only using a
100MB network currently so throughput on the storage is not a problem as I
can
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:24:20PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
Thank you very much indeed, Roland, for your explanation.
Harald
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:05:28PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> > > How do you do that precisely ?
> > > ``WITH_REALPLAYER=no'' in /etc/make.conf ?
> >
> > cd /us/ports/multimedia/mplayer
> > make config
> > Scroll down to the "REALPLAYER Enable real player plugin" line
> > to un-check the line
>
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:00:12AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > Good catch! I think that is indeed the problem. I disabled realplayer
> > > support for mplayer ages ago, so it doesn't show up in my list.
> >
> > How do you do that precisely ?
> > ``WITH_REALPLAYER=no'' in /etc/make.conf ?
> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:14:37 +0200
> From: Harald Weis
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:01:01AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
>
> > Good catch! I think that is indeed the problem. I disabled realplayer
> > support for mplayer ages ago, so it doesn't sho
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:01:01AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> Good catch! I think that is indeed the problem. I disabled realplayer
> support for mplayer ages ago, so it doesn't show up in my list.
How do you do that precisely ?
``WITH_REALPLAYER=no'' in /etc/make.conf ?
Thanks
Harald
_
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:01:01AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:35:04PM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > I am not the OP, however I also ran into warnings about mplayer and
> > linux-pango. I believe the problem comes from linux-realplayer
> >
> > # cd /usr/ports/multime
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:35:04PM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > > > Are you running a linux binary of mplayer? Because a native mplayer
> > > > binary does not require linux-pango! It just uses the native pango.
> > >
> > > In fact, it's lxdvdrip which requires linux-pango [via linux-gtk2].
> > >
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 07:32:37PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> > > > Building lxdvdrip stops because l
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> > > Building lxdvdrip stops because linux-pango has known
> > > vulnerabilities.
> >
> > You can ignore vu
:
>>
>> mplayer dvd://N -dumpstream -dumpfile title.mpg
>>
>> where N is the number of the title you want.
and though it doesn't help you with your specific problem. Ever took a look
into handbrake? Handbrake is a fin
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> > Building lxdvdrip stops because linux-pango has known
> > vulnerabilities.
>
> You can ignore vulnerabilities by setting the environment variable
> DISABLE_VULNERABILITI
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> Building lxdvdrip stops because linux-pango has known
> vulnerabilities.
You can ignore vulnerabilities by setting the environment variable
DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES. See ports(7).
> Is there a risk if mplayer (which requires linux-pang
Building lxdvdrip stops because linux-pango has known
vulnerabilities.
Is there a risk if mplayer (which requires linux-pango)
is only used locally by lxdvdrip, but never on-line
by firefox which would not use any mplayer plugin ?
For example I could easily control this with mozplugger.
Thank you
Hello,
I'm trying to replace our current firewall (clavister) with freebsd/pf.
I'm almost done but I have some rules I don't know how to convert. I've
tried googling around but I've found nothing useful (maybe I'm looking
for the wrong terms).
I have the following scenario:
LAN (192.168.1.0/
Dan Naumov wrote:
> Anyone else think that this combined with freebsd-update integration
> and a simplistic menu GUI for choosing the preferred boot environment
> would make an _awesome_ addition to the base system? :)
I guess freebsd-update is not a problem, should be "freebsd-update -b
". But I
Anyone else think that this combined with freebsd-update integration
and a simplistic menu GUI for choosing the preferred boot environment
would make an _awesome_ addition to the base system? :)
- Dan Naumov
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Philipp Wuensche wrote:
> I wrote a script implementing
Dan Naumov wrote:
>
> Reading that made me pause for a second and made me go "WOW", this is how
> UNIX system upgrades should be done. Any hope of us lowly users ever seeing
> something like this implemented in FreeBSD? :)
I wrote a script implementing the most useful features of the solaris
live
I have a proof of concept system doing this. I started with a 7.2
install on zfs root, compiled world and kernel from 8, took a snapshot
and made a clone for the 7.2 install, and proceeded to upgrade the
current fs to 8.0. After updating the loader.conf in the 7.2 zfs to
point to its own clon
A little more info for the (perhaps) curious:
Managing Multiple Boot Environments:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2009.06/getstart/bootenv.html#bootenvmgr
Introduction to Boot Environments:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2009.06/snapupgrade/index.html
- Dan Naumov
On Tue, Jun 2, 20
This reminds me. I was reading the release and upgrade notes of OpenSolaris
2009.6 and noted one thing about upgrading from a previous version to the
new one::
When you pick the "upgrade OS" option in the OpenSolaris installer, it will
check if you are using a ZFS root partition and if you do, it
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
root filesystem is remounted read write only for some configuration
changes, then remounted back to read only.
Does this work reliably for you? I tried doing the remounting trick,
both for root and /usr, back in the 4.x time frame. And could never
get it to work - woul
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
> On 31/05/2009, at 4:41 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
>
> To top that
>> off, even when/if you do it right, not your entire disk goes to ZFS
>> anyway, because you still do need a swap and a /boot to be non-ZFS, so
>> you will have to install
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
root filesystem is remounted read write only for some configuration
changes, then remounted back to read only.
Does this work reliably for you? I tried doing the remounting trick,
both for root and /usr, back in the 4.x time frame. And could never
get it to work - would
> root filesystem is remounted read write only for some configuration
> changes, then remounted back to read only.
Does this work reliably for you? I tried doing the remounting trick,
both for root and /usr, back in the 4.x time frame. And could never
get it to work - would always end up with inc
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Dan Naumov wrote:
USB root partition for booting off UFS is something I have
considered. I have looked around and it seems that all the "install
FreeBSD onto USB stick" guides seem to involve a lot of manual work
from a fixit environment, does sysinsta
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Dan Naumov wrote:
> USB root partition for booting off UFS is something I have
> considered. I have looked around and it seems that all the "install
> FreeBSD onto USB stick" guides seem to involve a lot of manual work
> from a fixit environment, does sysinstall not recognise US
host a root partition on,
without having to setup some crazy GEOM mirror setup using 2 of them?
- Dan Naumov
2009/6/2 Gerrit Kühn
> On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:41:36 +0300 Dan Naumov wrote
> about ZFS NAS configuration question:
>
> DN> So, this leaves me with 1 SATA port used f
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:41:36 +0300 Dan Naumov wrote
about ZFS NAS configuration question:
DN> So, this leaves me with 1 SATA port used for a FreeBSD disk and 4 SATA
DN> ports available for tinketing with ZFS.
Do you have a USB port available to boot from? A conventional USB stick (I
us
On 31/05/2009, at 4:41 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
To top that
off, even when/if you do it right, not your entire disk goes to ZFS
anyway, because you still do need a swap and a /boot to be non-ZFS, so
you will have to install ZFS onto a slice and not the entire disk and
even SUN discourages to do th
The system that I built had 5 x 72GB SCA SCSI drives. Just to keep my
own sanity, I decided that I'd configure the fdisk partitioning
identically
across all of the drives. So that they all have a 1GB slice and and a
71GB
slice.
The drives all have identical capacity, so the second 71GB sli
Is the idea behind leaving 1GB unused on each disk to work around the
problem of potentially being unable to replace a failed device in a
ZFS pool because a 1TB replacement you bought actually has a lower
sector count than your previous 1TB drive (since the replacement
device has to be either of ex
S gmirror file system, just to have an
full environment to debug from, if necessary, rather than just a /boot.
Just some ideas..
louie
On May 30, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
Hey
I am not entirely sure if this question belongs here or to another
list, so feel free to direct me elsewhe
Hey
I am not entirely sure if this question belongs here or to another
list, so feel free to direct me elsewhere :)
Anyways, I am trying to figure out the best way to configure a NAS
system I will soon get my hands on, it's a Tranquil BBS2 (
http://www.tranquilpc-shop.co.uk/aca
Howdy!
Amd64, 7.1.
Few days ago I replaced dieing dvd writer with brand
new pioneer 116d. In the kernel I removed all not
needed stuff and included atapicam and both cd and
acd. Previously I used cd only with no hiss. Making
dvd I first encountered error at the very beginning
of the whole process:
Hello,
I set up a second routingtable and told rc.d/jail to use the FIB1.
Now I wonder why the SSHd in the jail isn't responding. I set the
default router to a local address and the second default router in FIB1
to the ISP router, reachable via a second NIC.
Does the FIb only work for outgoing
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:48:53PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > This system is missing from the devd.conf manual page, nor is DEVFS
> > mentioned in /usr/share/examples/etc/devd.conf. Is it documented
> > somewhere else?
>
> No, it is not documented anywhere.
> Feel free to send me the docum
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 07:28:39PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 03:23:46PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 28/02/2009 16:34 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:
> > >> I'm trying to make devd run an stty
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 03:23:46PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 28/02/2009 16:34 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:
> >> I'm trying to make devd run an stty command whenever a USB serial device
> >> is attached. Unfortunately
Andriy Gapon writes:
> on 28/02/2009 16:34 Kostik Belousov said the following:
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:
>>> I'm trying to make devd run an stty command whenever a USB serial device
>>> is attached. Unfortunately, $device-name is ucom[0-9] and the devic
on 02/03/2009 15:51 Michael Sperber said the following:
> Andriy Gapon writes:
>
>> on 28/02/2009 16:34 Kostik Belousov said the following:
>>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:
I'm trying to make devd run an stty command whenever a USB serial device
is at
on 28/02/2009 16:34 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:
>> I'm trying to make devd run an stty command whenever a USB serial device
>> is attached. Unfortunately, $device-name is ucom[0-9] and the device
>> names are /dev/cuaU[0-9]
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:47:07AM -0500, Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
> Hi, Luigi and Fabio:
>
> I have a question about the GEOM disk scheduler you announed a while ago.
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-January/047597.html
>
> Can you tell me how does the
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
> I'm trying to make devd run an stty command whenever a USB serial device
> is attached. Unfortunately, $device-name is ucom[0-9] and the device
> names are /dev/cuaU[0-9] - how do I get the correct name in the device
> action?
I'm trying to make devd run an stty command whenever a USB serial device
is attached. Unfortunately, $device-name is ucom[0-9] and the device
names are /dev/cuaU[0-9] - how do I get the correct name in the device
action? I haven't found a way to extract the number by itself, so I'm
stuck with sp
Hi, Luigi and Fabio:
I have a question about the GEOM disk scheduler you announed a while ago.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-January/047597.html
Can you tell me how does the scheduler interact with gjournal?
Do you expect to improve response time even if used together
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, lhmwzy wrote:
> OK.It's my mistake.
> Improve it again:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {printf("%.2fM\n",j/1024/1024)}'
Sure. Here it runs about 7% faster precalculating one division:
$ time find . -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {printf("%.
OK.It's my mistake.
Improve it again:
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {printf("%.2fM\n",j/1024/1024)}'
2008/10/8 Ian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, lhmwzy wrote:
> > The fllow is better?
> > #!/bin/sh
> > find $1 -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5}
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, lhmwzy wrote:
> The fllow is better?
> #!/bin/sh
> find $1 -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print j"M"}'
Review your 'ls -lh' output; what's 100Bananas + 10Kiwifruit + 1Melon?
$ find . -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print j"M"}'
1.15975e+06
The fllow is better?
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print j"M"}'
2008/10/7 Andrew Snow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I
>> have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will
>> fit onto a CD or
I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I
have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will
fit onto a CD or not :-)
I have created a shell script, /usr/local/bin/dirsize :
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {print j}'
Usage: dirsize
__
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 12:43:45 Pete French wrote:
> > Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we
> > limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)?
> > Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc.
>
> On a related not
Yes,this is a problem.
In my case,"du -h" displays 1M,but the actual size is about 24M.
2008/10/7 Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we
>> limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)?
>> Should we take
You're right.
I turn off the compression,everything go well.
So this is my problem,not a ZFS of FreeBSD problme.
Tks for reply.
2008/10/7 Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
.00M -
>> > pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x -
>
> Turn compression off and retry.
>
__
sorry,I make a mistake.
It is a filesystem,not a volume.
2008/10/7 Holger Kipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> according to zfs manpage:
>
> Quotas cannot be set on volumes, as the "volsize" property acts as
> an implicit quota.
>
___
freebsd
> Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we
> limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)?
> Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc.
On a related note, is there any way to make du tell me how big files
are in actu
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:30:09AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > Turn compression off and retry.
>
> Yep, that's the key!
>
> # zfs set quota=4g storage/home
> # zfs set compression=off storage
> # zfs get compression,quot
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
> > > I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use "zfs set
> > > quota=1m pool/lhm"
> > >
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:12:59AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Holger Kipp wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
> > > > I create a zfs volume pool/lhm a
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
> > I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use "zfs set
> > quota=1m pool/lhm"
> >
> > #zfs get all pool/lhm
> > zfs get all pool/lhm
> > [ttyp0][5:22:12pm]
> > N
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Holger Kipp wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
> > > I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use "zfs set
> > > quota=1m pool/lhm"
>
> > I can co
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
> I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use "zfs set
> quota=1m pool/lhm"
according to zfs manpage:
Quotas cannot be set on volumes, as the "volsize" property acts as
an implicit quota.
Aditionally, I se
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
> > I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use "zfs set
> > quota=1m pool/lhm"
> I can confirm and reproduce what you're seeing.
>
> Based on all of the ZFS docu
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
> I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use "zfs set
> quota=1m pool/lhm"
>
> #zfs get all pool/lhm
> zfs get all pool/lhm
> [ttyp0][5:22:12pm]
> NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
> pool/lhm type
My system
#uname -a
FreeBSD bxzxfreebsd.slof.com 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #4:
Mon Oct 6 15:02:42 CST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lhmwzy amd64
zfs version:
ZFS filesystem version 6
ZFS storage pool version 6
___
freebsd-stab
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use "zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm"
#zfs get all pool/lhm
zfs get all pool/lhm
[ttyp0][5:22:12pm]
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
pool/lhm type filesystem -
pool/lhm creation Tue Oct 7 17:14 2008
On Friday 19 September 2008 10:20 am, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 07:47:18 am Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > I have recently updated a machine to 7-stable.
> > > ACPI doesn't seem to work correctly on this machine.
> > > With earlier versions of Fre
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 11:44 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 September 2008 07:47:18 am Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have recently updated a machine to 7-stable.
> > ACPI doesn't seem to work correctly on this machine.
> > With earlier versions of FreeBSD (including t
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 September 2008 07:47:18 am Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > I have recently updated a machine to 7-stable.
> > ACPI doesn't seem to work correctly on this machine.
> > With earlier versions of FreeBSD (including the latest
> > RELENG_6), I got this line in dmesg:
John Baldwin wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > [...]
> > Now i'm wondering: Has the ACPI blacklist been removed
> > intentionally, or is this a regression? Certainly I did
> > not find any mentioning of it in UPDATING or anywhere
> > else.
>
> This is a regression. Try this fix:
>
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 07:47:18 am Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have recently updated a machine to 7-stable.
> ACPI doesn't seem to work correctly on this machine.
> With earlier versions of FreeBSD (including the latest
> RELENG_6), I got this line in dmesg:
>
>ACPI disabled b
Hello,
I have recently updated a machine to 7-stable.
ACPI doesn't seem to work correctly on this machine.
With earlier versions of FreeBSD (including the latest
RELENG_6), I got this line in dmesg:
ACPI disabled by blacklist. Contact your BIOS vendor.
And everything was fine. The box runs
Quoting "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:04:36PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Paul Schmehl, and lo! it spake thus:
If you plan on doing this often, pkgtools.conf is your best bet. If you
plan on doing it once, commandline is probably the easiest and quickest.
Quoting Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--On August 26, 2008 3:05:25 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, and thank you very much for your reply.
Yes. After looking closely at the variable, I discovered that also.
So I used the PREFIX=/usr/local/php5. But as I build it (via
php5-extensi
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:04:36PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Paul Schmehl, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> If you plan on doing this often, pkgtools.conf is your best bet. If you
> plan on doing it once, commandline is probably the easiest and quickest.
I would say using ports-mgmt/portconf would b
--On August 26, 2008 3:05:25 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, and thank you very much for your reply.
Yes. After looking closely at the variable, I discovered that also.
So I used the PREFIX=/usr/local/php5. But as I build it (via
php5-extensions)
I am not seeing the PREFIX variable ref
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--On August 26, 2008 2:09:27 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have a close look at $LOCALBASE. That sounds like a good
candidate. With any luck, it'll also cover extensions, ini(s), and
related libs. :)
Please be a
Quoting Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--On August 26, 2008 2:09:27 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have a close look at $LOCALBASE. That sounds like a good
candidate. With any luck, it'll also cover extensions, ini(s), and
related libs. :)
Please be aware that if you change ${LOC
--On August 26, 2008 2:09:27 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have a close look at $LOCALBASE. That sounds like a good
candidate. With any luck, it'll also cover extensions, ini(s), and
related libs. :)
Please be aware that if you change ${LOCALBASE} you change it for *all*
subsequentl
Hi--
On Aug 26, 2008, at 12:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/configured, and
in use copy of PHP4 (apache_module, C
Quoting Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi--
On Aug 26, 2008, at 12:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/configure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Chris St Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/config
Quoting Chris St Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/configured, and
in use copy of P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/configured, and
in use copy of PHP4 (apache_module, CLI, & CGI). I spent some
Greetings,
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/configured, and
in use copy of PHP4 (apache_module, CLI, & CGI). I spent some time
attempting to find su
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 03:22:21AM -0700, Unga wrote:
> 1) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmpmod.h
/usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/Makefile
> 2) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_mibII.h
/usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_mibII/Makefile
> 3) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_atm.h
/usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_a
Hi
Could I know on i386 RELENG_7, what Makefiles install following header files:
1) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmpmod.h
2) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_mibII.h
3) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_atm.h
Appreciate your reply very much.
Kind regards
Unga
___
freebs
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:54:57AM +, Pollywog wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2008 23:55:25 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> > On 2008 Jun 29, at 19:22, Jeff Richards wrote:
> > > After setting those options I kill -HUP the sshd process.
> >
> > I thought sshd ignored SIGHUP and you had to actual
I have started experimenting with gjournal filesystems this weekend. I found
something that may be a mistake I made. Not sure.
To break up my IDE drive into the filesystems I wanted I created multiple
slices. On slice 2 I had multiple gjournal filesystems. I tried creating a
journal on sli
On Sunday 29 June 2008 23:55:25 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On 2008 Jun 29, at 19:22, Jeff Richards wrote:
> > After setting those options I kill -HUP the sshd process.
>
> I thought sshd ignored SIGHUP and you had to actually stop and restart
> it to pick up configuration changes.
IIRC, I
On 2008 Jun 29, at 19:22, Jeff Richards wrote:
After setting those options I kill -HUP the sshd process.
I thought sshd ignored SIGHUP and you had to actually stop and restart
it to pick up configuration changes.
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi. I have configured sshd in OpenBSD to require publickey authentication.
I've tried configuring FreeBSD to do the same, but I can still login via
keyboard authentication.
Here are the options I have in my sshd_config:
PasswordAuthentication no
ChallengeResponseAuthentication no
UsePAM no
Af
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:13:19AM -0700, Rob Lytle wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> I noticed that most all of the files in my old /etc/rc.d had 555
> permissions. There were 4 or 5 that had 644 permissions in my old
> /etc/rc.d. What I am wondering is if all the files in rc.d should be
> 555? So far I
Hi Jeremy,
I noticed that most all of the files in my old /etc/rc.d had 555
permissions. There were 4 or 5 that had 644 permissions in my old
/etc/rc.d. What I am wondering is if all the files in rc.d should be
555? So far I am not experiencing any problems with anything with a
very few 644 fil
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:33:16AM +0100, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > I have disks on the internal ICH7 adapters (on the motherboard), SATA,
> > and also a TWE controller with two disks.
> >
> > When hitting the TWE controller hard I can hose the I/O pe
301 - 400 of 931 matches
Mail list logo
