On 8 February 2013 20:42, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> Wiadomość napisana przez Eitan Adler w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 20:05:
>> On 8 February 2013 13:46, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>>> Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz.
>>> 16:08:
Hello,
>>
Wiadomość napisana przez Eitan Adler w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 20:05:
> On 8 February 2013 13:46, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>> Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz.
>> 16:08:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1).
>>>
>
On 8 February 2013 13:46, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 16:08:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1).
>>
>> In my tests, "D" means "delete_child" and "d" "delete"; like it's true
>> for othe
Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 16:08:
> Hello,
>
> I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1).
>
> In my tests, "D" means "delete_child" and "d" "delete"; like it's true
> for other NFSv4 implementations. But manpage tells the other way around.
Hello,
I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1).
In my tests, "D" means "delete_child" and "d" "delete"; like it's true
for other NFSv4 implementations. But manpage tells the other way around.
Since things didn't work as expected when I followed the man page I
checked the followin
