Konstantin Belousov writes:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:54:25PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 24 Feb 2016, at 12:27, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm reviewing an update to the textproc/miller port in bug 207194, and
>> > noticed it does some ugly things in post-configure to see
Konstantin Belousov writes:
> This is probably not a clang bug, but could be. More likely it is ld problem.
> I do not want to dig into the issue, but I can provide you some points to
> look at further.
>
> The _end symbol is magic, it is defined as the address of the last byte
> + 1 of zero-ini
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:54:25PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2016, at 12:27, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> >
> > I'm reviewing an update to the textproc/miller port in bug 207194, and
> > noticed it does some ugly things in post-configure to seemingly
> > work around the following
On 24 Feb 2016, at 12:27, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>
> I'm reviewing an update to the textproc/miller port in bug 207194, and
> noticed it does some ugly things in post-configure to seemingly
> work around the following problem (on 11-HEAD at least):
>
> % echo 'int main(void) { return 0; }'
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:27:03PM +0100, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> I'm reviewing an update to the textproc/miller port in bug 207194, and
> noticed it does some ugly things in post-configure to seemingly
> work around the following problem (on 11-HEAD at least):
>
> % echo 'int main(void) {
I'm reviewing an update to the textproc/miller port in bug 207194, and
noticed it does some ugly things in post-configure to seemingly
work around the following problem (on 11-HEAD at least):
% echo 'int main(void) { return 0; }' > foo.c
% clang -pg foo.c -lm
/usr/bin/ld: undefined reference to
