On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>
>
> there's no libvirt for bhyve yet, which turns some people off.
>
Wrong.
See:
https://libvirt.org/drvbhyve.html
http://www.slideshare.net/CraigRodrigues1/libvirt-bhyve
libvirt/bhyve is definitely not as polished as libvirt/KVM.
It defini
>Hi all,
>
>I found the source of the problem. Once upon a time I compiled my
> kernel with OFED support (WITH_OFED in /etc/src.conf). That installed
> $INCLUDE/rdma/rdma_cma.h, which at the time of the installation (haven't
> checked now) were missing the rdma_addrinfo structs.
>
>Mo
On 01/04/2015 18:51, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 01/04/15 a les 17.28, Gustau Pérez ha escrit:
> >Hi Roger,
>>I'm trying to build xen-tools in my laptop. It runs this:
>>
>> FreeBSD portgus 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #4
>> r279875+f0e745a(HEAD): Sat Mar 14 16:55
El 01/04/15 a les 17.28, Gustau Pérez ha escrit:
>Hi Roger,
>
>I'm trying to build xen-tools in my laptop. It runs this:
>
> FreeBSD portgus 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #4
> r279875+f0e745a(HEAD): Sat Mar 14 16:55:11 CET 2015
>
>the build was done with gcc48,
Udo Rader wrote:
> ...
>
> Raw disks are fine with us as we do not overprovision storage (at least
> not yet).
nfs, with the server running zfs "raid10", and the guest as an nfs client,
using the "bridge" network, is as fast for normal file i/o (like un-tarring a
big file) as native zfs on the
Udo Rader wrote:
> ...
>
> I understand, that bhyve is native to BSD and will probably be the most
> effective. But given its relatively 'young age', is it production ready
> for (non nested) x86/amd64 linux guests?
there's no libvirt for bhyve yet, which turns some people off. (not me,
i don't
·
On 01/04/2015 12:41, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> first please excuse if this may be a FAQ, but even though I am a long
>> time linux admin (~1996), I am quite new to the *BSD world and I am
>> trying to evaluate if FreeBSD fits our virt
On 2015-04-01 16:46, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
El 01/04/15 a les 16.27, Gerd Hafenbrack ha escrit:
... The documentation for FreeBSD as Dom0 seems outdated anyway to me.
The document was last modified on the 15th of March 2015. I know things
move fast in the IT industry, but I wouldn't ca
Hello,
El 01/04/15 a les 16.27, Gerd Hafenbrack ha escrit:
> On 2015-04-01 16:19, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 01/04/15 a les 14.59, Udo Rader ha escrit:
>>> ... thanks for pointing Xen out. I was indeed not aware of Xen
>>> running on
>>> FreeBSD, an intriguing (and well known) alternative.
>>>
>
On 2015-04-01 16:19, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 01/04/15 a les 14.59, Udo Rader ha escrit:
... thanks for pointing Xen out. I was indeed not aware of Xen running on
FreeBSD, an intriguing (and well known) alternative.
The wiki says, that migrate/save/restore are missing from the *BSD port.
Is th
El 01/04/15 a les 14.59, Udo Rader ha escrit:
> On 04/01/2015 12:41 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit:
>>> As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors:
>>>
>>> * bhyve
>>> * KVM
>>> * QEMU
>>> * VirtualBox
>>
>> Make that 5:
>>
On 04/01/2015 01:43 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Bhyve only supports raw disk images.. I'ts quite early in it's
> developement life so some features may not
> be present yet.
thanks for your insights.
what you write about bhyve sounds quite good, so I'll give that a try as
well.
Raw disks are fi
On 04/01/2015 12:41 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit:
>> As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors:
>>
>> * bhyve
>> * KVM
>> * QEMU
>> * VirtualBox
>
> Make that 5:
> * Xen: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_Dom0
>
> Altoug
On 4/1/15 6:30 PM, Udo Rader wrote:
Hi all,
first please excuse if this may be a FAQ, but even though I am a long
time linux admin (~1996), I am quite new to the *BSD world and I am
trying to evaluate if FreeBSD fits our virtualization needs.
So, for my many questions:
As far as my homework di
El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit:
> Hi all,
>
> first please excuse if this may be a FAQ, but even though I am a long
> time linux admin (~1996), I am quite new to the *BSD world and I am
> trying to evaluate if FreeBSD fits our virtualization needs.
>
> So, for my many questions:
>
Hi all,
first please excuse if this may be a FAQ, but even though I am a long
time linux admin (~1996), I am quite new to the *BSD world and I am
trying to evaluate if FreeBSD fits our virtualization needs.
So, for my many questions:
As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four
16 matches
Mail list logo
