#x27;Intel Corporation'
device = 'X540 Ethernet Controller Virtual Function'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
ppt26@pci0:129:0:185: class=0x02 card=0x1458 chip=0x15158086
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Cor
options=21
media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T )
status: active
groups: epair
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Eric Joyner wrote:
> Did you do an ifconfig up on ix1 before loading the VF driver?
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:57 AM Ultima wrote:
>
>> Decided to do some testing with
This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2
Ultima
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Pieper, Jeffrey E <
jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, how many cores does your system have?
>
> Jeff
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-curr...@free
Yeah, dmesg does show 48. 12 Cores and 24 threads each. 48 total
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> isn't that 48 cores (12 real 12 virtual) per CPU?
>
>
> On 22/02/2016 21:26, Ultima wrote:
>
>> This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2
>>
er received.
I'v already double checked VT-d, but I'll make it tripple! =] I can't reset
the system right now, but ill send an update when possible with only 2 vf's
and unmodified generic.
Ultima
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Eric Joyner wrote:
> I don't really h
in bios likely played a role in this.
If you have any ideas, I'm willing to test them.
Thanks! =]
VT-d screen: https://puu.sh/niyiq/4fee92e4a3.jpgn
PCI advanced options: https://puu.sh/niyjg/88e71e48d9.jpgn
Ultima
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Ultima wrote:
> I forgot to mention
t think I listed the motherboards in question yet so ill list them
now.
S1200BTLRM -
http://ark.intel.com/products/69633/Intel-Server-Board-S1200BTLRM?q=S1200BTLRM
MD80-TM0 - http://b2b.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5146#ov
I'm not sure if it will be
F driver?
>
> I've tried SR-IOV on a system here, and I can confirm that traffic stops
> passing on the PF interface when you create a VF interface. That didn't
> used to happen, so I'm investigating why that is right now.
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:09 AM Ultima wrot
if you're still interested in this, but did you do "kenv
> hw.vmm.force_iommu=1" before loading the vmm module? I think that might be
> necessary.
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:12 PM Ultima wrote:
>
>> Yeah, still getting the -100 error, I do have sendmail disable
returned 5
ixv0: at device 0.129 on pci12
ixv0: Using MSIX interrupts with 2 vectors
ixv0: ixgbe_reset_hw() failed with error -100
device_attach: ixv0 attach returned 5
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Ultima wrote:
> I have been interested in this when I first read about it in 2012. =]
>
ut error
# dmesg
ixv0: at device 0.129 numa-domain 1 on pci12
ixv0: Using MSIX interrupts with 2 vectors
ixv0: ixgbe_reset_hw() failed with error -100
device_attach: ixv0 attach returned 5
# cat /etc/iovctl.conf
PF {
device : ix1;
num_vfs : 31;
}
DEFAULT {
passthrough : true;
}
Jeb,
Okay, just wanted to make sure it was known. =]
Ultima
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:36 PM, cramerj wrote:
> Yeah, we're running into some issues with our implementation. I'm working
> on the VF driver now and hope to get some of these bugs fixed within the
> next coupl
12 matches
Mail list logo
