Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
Hi,
i guess a lot of us feel the same (mainly sadness) about the progress here and
a lot of us have to feed penguins meanwhile...
I personally think, that the virtualization technology in general is one of the
key technologies of tomorrow and therefore it makes me even more sad, that
FreeBSD f
The best thing users can do is -tell- the FreeBSD foundation that
they're interested in this and in what way they're interested.
If you're a company that is or would like to be deploying FreeBSD on
Xen, you should also do this.
Adrian
2009/8/24 Kai Mosebach :
> Hi,
>
> i guess a lot of us feel
I've kept quiet, but I wonder why we're feeding penguins for dom0,
when netbsd has dom0 support since 4.0
Why are we feeding penguins, when support is already in the BSD's?
Can't we use NetBSD's Xen knowhow to bring FreeBSD into it?
Any insight would be a nice starter.
--Tim
_
Tim Judd writes:
>
>
>
> I've kept quiet, but I wonder why we're feeding penguins for dom0,
> when netbsd has dom0 support since 4.0
I started out using NetBSD3 xen2 - it worked beautifully but didn't support
x86_64 or i386PAE, so I switched to a Linux Dom0 so I could use servers
with more th
> I've kept quiet, but I wonder why we're feeding penguins for dom0,
> when netbsd has dom0 support since 4.0
i need the file system flexibility of zfs. nothing in netbsd. penguin
has lvm, which gets a lot of what one needs.
randy
___
freebsd-xen@free
Randy Bush wrote:
>> I've kept quiet, but I wonder why we're feeding penguins for dom0,
>> when netbsd has dom0 support since 4.0
For my part, I am much more concerned with getting a working domU
for i386 and amd64 than with *BSD as a dom0.
___
freebsd-
