Bernd Blaauw escreveu:
reason was for better bug reporting. People often only report the
FreeDOS version, or something out of VER.
Hardly ever VER /R, let alone the production date of a (CVS) kernel
which can only be viewed at boottime.
I agree. I would like to propose thar the "VER" command
David O'Shea schreef:
It says "The UNSTABLE (aka development) branch is what I refer to as the
development kernel (kernels with w suffix)." It looks like those kernels
actually have ".dev" or ".dbgdev" in them, right?
There doesn't seem to be a discussion of the naming convention for FreeCOM.
Howdy,
> Hi,
> http://fdos.org/kernel/
> makes people use 8086 FreeCOM if I understand the text right.
> This means they will likely have no XMS swap and no LOADHIGH.
> In short, they will think FreeCOM is really a BAD command.com
I find the site a bit confusing.
It says "The UNSTABLE (aka devel
Bart Oldeman schreef:
To be fair I found Eric's email rather demanding. In general if you
want things to happen in the NEAR future you either have to do it
yourself or pay big bucks, not just pizza money. Certainly when the
kernel doesn't have a real maintainer (just an interim one who does
wh
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Kenneth J. Davis wrote:
Just wanted to let everyone know I haven't completely dropped off the face
of the Earth, but my moving is taking me longer than anticipated, so I
still don't have my computers yet. Once I'm back operational I'll finish
my merge work and release a new
Just wanted to let everyone know I haven't completely dropped off the face
of the Earth, but my moving is taking me longer than anticipated, so I
still don't have my computers yet. Once I'm back operational I'll finish
my merge work and release a new stable kernel and see read the rest of
this req
Eric Auer escreveu:
Hi,
http://fdos.org/kernel/
makes people use 8086 FreeCOM if I understand the text right.
This means they will likely have no XMS swap and no LOADHIGH.
In short, they will think FreeCOM is really a BAD command.com
I agree.
My other wish is using a new version number. PLE
Hi,
http://fdos.org/kernel/
makes people use 8086 FreeCOM if I understand the text right.
This means they will likely have no XMS swap and no LOADHIGH.
In short, they will think FreeCOM is really a BAD command.com
Please make the XMS SWAP 186+ FreeCOM the one which is linked
at the "Stable Kernel
