Hi!
Offtopic...
But PTS DOS 32 is avaiable now at
http://www.phystechsoft.com/ptsdos/products.php?page=4 !
Bye, FLo
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on a
Why do not to unite all (*DOS) efforts in to one project?
--
Take care
Your friend IcE <2:550/112>
np: 101.20 Hit FM
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Florian Xaver wrote:
>Offtopic...
>But PTS DOS 32 is avaiable now at
>http://www.phystechsoft.com/ptsdos/products.php?page=4 !
Unfortunately, not all DOS efforts believe in making their projects
available as Free or Open Source software. You'll note PTS-DOS-32 is
proprietary (closed-source) software, although cheap ($20 per copy).
-jh
IcE wrote:
Why do not to unite all (*DOS) efforts in to one project?
--
Take care
Y
Wow, I'm impressed by all the discussion this has sparked. It's good to see
an active dev community. So I think I'm nearly ready to start futzing around
with FreeDOS code, but it's still a little foreign to me: I'm used to 32-bit
Windows C++. In Visual Studio, no less. Are there any good books or o
Personally I use VC++ for all my projects, then compile htem on teh correct
environment (GCC for dos, linux, etc, VC++ for win32, a mac compiler for
mac, etc). The lookup features and the keyword completion in VC++ is just
too useful. Plus compiling it in VC++ before trying to compile in other
en
Alrighty, so I wrote the GameLauncher list with a problem I was having in
FreeDOS. GameLauncher is a frontend for a bunch of emulators that basically
allows you to pick a game, then it runs the emulator with said game. I.e., I
select Arkanoid for the NES, and it would run 'c:\ARCADE\ROCKNES\rocknes
Jay Maus wrote:
Wow, I'm impressed by all the discussion this has sparked. It's good to see
an active dev community. So I think I'm nearly ready to start futzing around
with FreeDOS code, but it's still a little foreign to me: I'm used to 32-bit
Windows C++. In Visual Studio, no less. Are there an
Lucas Pedrosa asked me about this today, so I've decided to look into it.
For Beta9 PR4, we had a zip file containing the base package files, exes,
kernel, and such. He used it to update his previous install to B9Pr4 value.
We need one for PR5.