On 2019-05-09 18:02 +0200, ZB wrote:
> BTW: which macroassembler you prefer?
I prefer NASM. The reason I initially forked lDebug was actually to keep
its source in the NASM dialect. Also, I adjusted the (default)
disassembly display to mostly match NASM's syntax.
Regards,
ecm
___
FWIW, I prefer NASM myself also. I started out using A86/A386 a long time ago
(before NASM and FASM even existed in a useful form) but my source code
eventually got too big for A86 to handle. A86 doesn't take advantage of
extended or expanded memory or protected mode so it can't handle large o
Is your win 2000 on fat32 or NTFS.
NTFS was made to resist coping.
I copied xp sp2 to flash without problems.
The XP was on Fat32 not NTFS.
Later versions of Ghost claim to copy
NTFS but it never worked for me. It
always failed.
cheers
DS
On Thu, 09 May 2019 16:45:32 + mich...@robinson-
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 03:33:29PM +, Bret Johnson wrote:
> FWIW, I prefer NASM myself also. I started out using A86/A386 a long
> time ago (before NASM and FASM even existed in a useful form) but my
> source code eventually got too big for A86 to handle. A86 doesn't take
> advantage of exte
