On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 20:21 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Lyude,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 04:53:11PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > This is something that we've wanted for a while now: the ability to
> > actually look up the respective drm_device for a given dr
Hi Lyude,
Thank you for the patch.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 04:53:11PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> This is something that we've wanted for a while now: the ability to
> actually look up the respective drm_device for a given drm_dp_aux struct.
> This will also allow us to transition over to using th
This is something that we've wanted for a while now: the ability to
actually look up the respective drm_device for a given drm_dp_aux struct.
This will also allow us to transition over to using the drm_dbg_*() helpers
for debug message printing, as we'll finally have a drm_device to reference
for d
