On 16.6.2016 11:34, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2016 11:23 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>
>> On 06/16/2016 06:55 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> TL;DR version:
>>> Upgrade to 389-ds-base-1.3.5.6-1.fc24.
>>>
>>> I was facing weird filter/ACI evaluation with 389 DS
>>>
On 06/16/2016 11:23 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/16/2016 06:55 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
TL;DR version:
Upgrade to 389-ds-base-1.3.5.6-1.fc24.
I was facing weird filter/ACI evaluation with 389 DS
389-ds-base-1.3.5.4-1.fc24.x86_64. Here is full story (written before I
realized that
On 06/16/2016 10:50 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 16.6.2016 10:47, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/16/2016 06:55 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
TL;DR version:
Upgrade to 389-ds-base-1.3.5.6-1.fc24.
I was facing weird filter/ACI evaluation with 389 DS
389-ds-base-1.3.5.4-1.fc24.x86_64. Here is full
On 06/16/2016 06:55 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
TL;DR version:
Upgrade to 389-ds-base-1.3.5.6-1.fc24.
I was facing weird filter/ACI evaluation with 389 DS
389-ds-base-1.3.5.4-1.fc24.x86_64. Here is full story (written before I
realized that DS is old one ...):
Test
First, let's try
On 16.6.2016 10:47, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 06:55 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> TL;DR version:
>> Upgrade to 389-ds-base-1.3.5.6-1.fc24.
>>
>> I was facing weird filter/ACI evaluation with 389 DS
>> 389-ds-base-1.3.5.4-1.fc24.x86_64. Here is full story (written before I
>>
On 06/16/2016 06:55 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
TL;DR version:
Upgrade to 389-ds-base-1.3.5.6-1.fc24.
I was facing weird filter/ACI evaluation with 389 DS
389-ds-base-1.3.5.4-1.fc24.x86_64. Here is full story (written before I
realized that DS is old one ...):
Test
First, let's try
Hello,
TL;DR version:
Upgrade to 389-ds-base-1.3.5.6-1.fc24.
I was facing weird filter/ACI evaluation with 389 DS
389-ds-base-1.3.5.4-1.fc24.x86_64. Here is full story (written before I
realized that DS is old one ...):
Test
First, let's try LDAP search with OR filter consisting of 5
