On Wed, February 1, 2012 15:04, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 07:28 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:02 +0100, Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this more like the expected output? :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No, I'm afraid it's not. That's a log of a legit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/2012 08:13 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Natxo Asenjo
wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dale Macartney
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have been experimenting with how best to address this, however I am
>>> constant
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dale Macartney
> wrote:
>
>> I have been experimenting with how best to address this, however I am
>> constantly being pushed back to the only way of having a userdir that
>> actually exists would be a homdir wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/2012 08:02 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dale Macartney
> wrote:
>
>> I have been experimenting with how best to address this, however I am
>> constantly being pushed back to the only way of having a userdir tha
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dale Macartney
wrote:
> I have been experimenting with how best to address this, however I am
> constantly being pushed back to the only way of having a userdir that
> actually exists would be a homdir which would be created when a user
> first logs in.
>
> Yes, if
