Yes, likely its the "T" version ISO (from what I've been reading off
cisco's site.
but I'll try both
Dan.
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Kevin Bonner wrote:
> We use IOS 12.2(4)T3 currently. Use radtest on your radius box to make sure
> all reply items are being sent as expected. That's about all I can
We use IOS 12.2(4)T3 currently. Use radtest on your radius box to make sure
all reply items are being sent as expected. That's about all I can think of
to try since the items are never seen by the cisco.
Kevin
On Thursday 14 November 2002 15:19, Dan wrote:
> I did that. total debugging on rad
I did that. total debugging on radius and looking at the logs,
and even debug on the cisco.
far as I can tell the cisco never sees this.
doesnt show up in the debugs or logs anywhere...
tried += as well, and := and == just to see, none of that worked.
I'm wondering if it needs a special IOS versio
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 14:31, Dan wrote:
> testuser Auth-Type := System
> Framed-Ip-Address =
> Cisco-AVPair = "lcp:interface-config=rate-limit output 128000 32000
>64000
> conform-action transmit exceed-action drop"
This is basically what we use to se
Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to limit the amount of bandwidth available to a user
> through radius?
Only if your NAS supports it in a RADIUS attribute.
> running radiusd in full debug I dont even see it sending this back
> to the user. and the user is not limited at all.
I can't seem to figure out how to do this.
the users are dynamic DSL users (get their IP from the router ip pool).
I've tried absolutely everything I can, I've read the docs, faqs, archives
(as much as I can),
and vendor websites.
Is there any way to limit the amount of bandwidth available to a u
