Tseveendorj Ochirlantuu wrote:
> I don't solved yet Simultaneous-Use. Few days ago I've installed new
> version FreeRADIUS 2.1.8. Before(a year ago) radutmp utility didn't show
> the current connected users but this time it works I get logged in users
> data in radutmp file
Well... that isn't
weiwei fang wrote:
> I am now using a WiMAX network and I want to use freeradius+mysql (and
> EAP, TLS) for it. Now I need to add some new attribute (such as the
> service level for a single client) in the mysql database. And then the
> freeradius server can return the attribute to tell the AGW.
>
rosect...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Does any one know any good document on the software source code
> architecture of freeradius? Thanks.
There is none. If there was, it would be distributed with FreeRADIUS.
The source code should be reasonably well organized.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/u
Dear Alan DeKok
Sorry for asking bothering question again.
I don't solved yet Simultaneous-Use. Few days ago I've installed new version
FreeRADIUS 2.1.8. Before(a year ago) radutmp utility didn't show the current
connected users but this time it works I get logged in users data in radutmp
file th
Does any one know any good document on the software source code architecture of
freeradius? Thanks.
- rosect190
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi, all!
I am now using a WiMAX network and I want to use freeradius+mysql (and EAP,
TLS) for it. Now I need to add some new attribute (such as the service level
for a single client) in the mysql database. And then the freeradius server
can return the attribute to tell the AGW.
I have looked up s
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Josip Rodin wrote:
> > IMHO just changing modules to the -enabled/-available scheme would be a good
> > first step and it should be done first, in 2.1.10 or whenever.
>
> I'd say 2.2.0. And then move eap.conf && sql.conf to raddb/mod
John Maher wrote:
> Yes, obviously an important distinction. But where my mind goes
> immediately is "why is it that if I enter an incorrect password for that
> user that the user fails to gain access, but a correct password results
> in access granted?".
doc/rlm_ldap explains this.
> But I i
On 05/23/2010 11:27 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> authorization != authentication
>
> If there isn't a password... the user can't be authenticated. The
> debug log shows this.
Yes, obviously an important distinction. But where my mind goes
immediately is "why is it that if I enter an incorrect
Quite new to FR2, though you could use that unlang feature to change 'on the
fly'
attributes and such. By identifying the nas type you could send the correct
attributes.
There is another way to approach this problem and that is to include both
vendor's set of attributes
to the NAS in your group pr
sbchem wrote:
> So the entry:
>
> pam_pass: function pam_authenticate FAILED for . Reason: Module is
> unknown
>
> is obviously supposed to give me the clue I need but I have no idea what it
> means.
It's an error produces by the PAM subsystem. Ask them what
it means.
Blaming FreeRADIU
>No, that's for authenticating against radius, different beast entirely
Okay, understood and removed all traces of it and changes to files I made
except left Auth-Type = pam in the users file
>If you're using the Red Hat RPM's that shouldn't be necessary, we already
include the pam configuratio
>pam_radius_auth. It allows *other* programs to use RADIUS for
authentication. It is *not*
>what you want.
Okay, understood and removed all traces of it and changes to files I made
except left Auth-Type = pam in the users file
>Please read the PAM module configuration: raddb/modules/pam
>It ex
John Maher wrote:
> Thanks for this information. Being very new to radius, and a bit sloppy
> with my wording, I was not clear about what I was looking for. It's true
> that the function of the different config files not that complicated.
> What is not clear to me, when looking at the output of fre
On 05/22/2010 05:37 PM, sbchem wrote:
you and John Dennis both mentioned PAM so I went ahead and commented out the
passwd entires and I am now looking at PAM per your suggestion.
Installed the pam-radius client per
http://freeradius.org/pam_radius_auth/
No, that's for authenticating against r
On 05/22/2010 01:45 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Johnny R wrote:
>> Alan,
>>
>> John Maher at the first post asked if there is any resource that is
>> particularly good at explaining how radius and its config files really
>> works. I want just to ask it again, if possible, it there is any thread
>> o
Josip Rodin wrote:
> IMHO just changing modules to the -enabled/-available scheme would be a good
> first step and it should be done first, in 2.1.10 or whenever.
I'd say 2.2.0. And then move eap.conf && sql.conf to raddb/modules*, too.
The only reason that eap.conf && sql.conf aren't in the
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 01:45:59PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> rather than renaming all the config files to have a common extension and
> only loading those files with extension the correct extension the
> preferred model would be to utilize enabled,available directories. The
> filenames woul
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 07:17:29PM +0100, Alan Buxey wrote:
> although some would say thats the package people talking - and that the issue
> is only present because of how package management tools etc work. surely
> the best way of RPM, APT etc leaving behind all their
> rubbish/old-files/new-fil
19 matches
Mail list logo