Re: Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-17 Thread Alan DeKok
Chris Howley wrote: > I can confirm that the change made to the event.c file fixed the problem > with the robust proxy accounting. That's great news! > Many thanks for you help. And thanks for spending the time to not only debug it, but provide useful feedback. Alan DeKo

Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-17 Thread Chris Howley
Alan & Ivan, I can confirm that the change made to the event.c file fixed the problem with the robust proxy accounting. Many thanks for you help. Chris - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-15 Thread Alan DeKok
Chris Howley wrote: > This is the debug output using the latest release of 2.1.7 from > http://git.freeradius.org/pre. Arg. There was an idiotic typo in the code. I can't help but feel at least partially responsible. OK... I've put the updated version on the same web site. You don't have

Re: Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-15 Thread Ivan Kalik
> Alan, > > This is the debug output using the latest release of 2.1.7 from > http://git.freeradius.org/pre. Hm, for some reason failure doesn'r result in retry in last pass: ... > Found Post-Proxy-Type > server home.example.com { > +- entering group Fail {...} > [detail.example.com] Suppressi

Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-15 Thread Chris Howley
Alan, This is the debug output using the latest release of 2.1.7 from http://git.freeradius.org/pre. Thanks for your help in advance. Chris -Original Message- From: Chris Howley [mailto:ecl...@netserv3.leeds.ac.uk] Sent: 15 June 2009 12:07 To: Chris Howley Subject: radius.debug4 endin

Re: Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-15 Thread Alan DeKok
Chris Howley wrote: > Here's the output from FR2.1.7. OK. Please grab an updated copy of the 2.1.7 tar file from http://git.freeradius.org/pre/ I've put some changes in which should help. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-12 Thread Chris Howley
Alan, Here's the output from FR2.1.7. Thanks for you help in advance, Chris ++[exec] returns noop Sending Access-Accept of id 128 to 10.12.80.109 port 32769 User-Name = "isschug" MS-MPPE-Recv-Key = 0x3019b4c8f9f76bb2fc4d69edbc20e98377351a661c0b412c760cd773e3b4c5f5 MS-M

Re: Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-12 Thread Alan DeKok
Chris Howley wrote: > I doubled the value of cleanup delay in radiusd.conf. This change didn't fix > the problem (see below). Grab a copy of the server from http://git.freeradius.org/pre/ I've added some debug messages which might help explain what's going on. Alan DeKok. - List info/subs

Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-12 Thread Chris Howley
Ivan, I doubled the value of cleanup delay in radiusd.conf. This change didn't fix the problem (see below). Thanks for your help, Chris ++[exec] returns noop Sending Access-Accept of id 88 to 10.12.80.109 port 32769 User-Name = "isschug" MS-MPPE-Recv-Key = 0x529e91a0004dce6a6b

Re: Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-11 Thread Ivan Kalik
> When both RADIUS servers are operational robust proxying works. When one > of the servers is > unreachable the other server (that's attempting to proxy an accounting > request) will delete > the detail.work file from the listener's sub-directory after failing to > get a response from > the other

Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-11 Thread Chris Howley
Ivan, When both RADIUS servers are operational robust proxying works. When one of the servers is unreachable the other server (that's attempting to proxy an accounting request) will delete the detail.work file from the listener's sub-directory after failing to get a response from the other serv

Re: Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-10 Thread Alan DeKok
Chris Howley wrote: > I used the example configuration and got the same result. Well... it worked the last time I tried it, hence the example. The goal is: a) have a "fallback" configuration in the pool that writes packets to the "detail" file b) read from the detail file, and try to prox

Re: Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-10 Thread Ivan Kalik
> Thank you for your help. I've removed the configuration from the > proxy.conf and I'm now using > the original robust-proxy-accounting file. However, the problem persists - > the detail.work > file is being erased. Which detail.work? Accounting one or failover o

Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-10 Thread Chris Howley
Alan, Thank you for your help. I've removed the configuration from the proxy.conf and I'm now using the original robust-proxy-accounting file. However, the problem persists - the detail.work file is being erased. Chris -Original Message- From: freeradius-users-bounces+

Re: Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-10 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > I used the example configuration and got the same result. . > 2. I moved the following from the robust-proxy-accounting file to the > proxy.conf file. why? the robust-accounting stuff is a self-contained virtual server. by putting this into proxy.conf you have intro

Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-10 Thread Chris Howley
tail file.++[detail.example.com] returns noop } # server acct_detail.example.com Going to the next request <<< Received proxied response from internal virtual server. server home.example.com { } 1) The following is in the robust-proxy-accounting file. # (5) Define the virtual server to

Re: Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-09 Thread Alan DeKok
Chris Howley wrote: Sending proxied request internally to virtual server. > server acct_detail.leeds.ac.uk { > +- entering group accounting {...} > [detail.leeds.ac.uk] Suppressing writes to detail file as the request was > just read from a detail file. > ++[detail.leeds.ac.uk] returns noop >

Robust proxy accounting

2009-06-09 Thread Chris Howley
Alan, I hoping you can help me. We're currently testing FR2.1.6 and robust proxy accounting. We have two servers running FR2.1.6. When both servers are operational the relaying of accounting packets works. However, when one of the servers is down the other operational server fails to r

Re: Trouble with Robust Proxy Accounting

2009-04-10 Thread Alan DeKok
JDL wrote: > In FreeRADIUS 2.x, the radrelay functions have been built into radiusd. That's the intention. > However, I seem to be having problems with data loss. Everything works > fine when the remote accounting server is up. However, when it goes > down, here is what I am seeing. ... > 4) He