On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:06:46AM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> All,
>
> Whilst I appreciate that organisations need not worry about this until the
> end of February, I'll be moving house then so I need to start thinking about
> this now, rather than later.
And to make a start on this, I've create
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:59:41PM +0900, Julien Guertault wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012, Thomas Adam :
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012, Michael Grosser :
> >
> >> Would it make sense to let touch screen support be a project idea
> >> for GSoC 2012 or any other year in the future?
> >
> > No -- because I,
Dan Espen wrote:
> Michael Großer writes:
>> When no WM is running, then no frames are around windows.
>
> Exactly.
>
>> Does a WM draw the frames around windows or does a
>> WM instruct X to draw frames around windows?
>
> Is this rhetorical? You just answered your own question.
When X.org d
Michael Großer writes:
> Julien Guertault wrote:
>> 2012/2/25 Thomas Adam :
>>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:02:48PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
Good point: Multiple mouse pointers, for example to change the size of
windows with two fingers. Is this rather "easy to implement" or rather
>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 08:47:12AM -0500, MK wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:16:58 +
> Thomas Adam wrote:
> > But until we decide to do it that way, it's a little moot, and it
> > would require some thought and design.
> >
> > Great for a project for GSoC I'd say, because thankfully I've plen
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:16:58 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> But until we decide to do it that way, it's a little moot, and it
> would require some thought and design.
>
> Great for a project for GSoC I'd say, because thankfully I've plenty
> of ideas on this. :P
I like these ideas too, although I'l
Julien Guertault wrote:
> 2012/2/25 Thomas Adam :
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:02:48PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
>>> Good point: Multiple mouse pointers, for example to change the size of
>>> windows with two fingers. Is this rather "easy to implement" or rather
>>> "utterly impossible to imple
2012/2/25 Thomas Adam :
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:02:48PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
>> Good point: Multiple mouse pointers, for example to change the size of
>> windows with two fingers. Is this rather "easy to implement" or rather
>> "utterly impossible to implement". The answer to this ques
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 06:32:46PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> The simple answer is that a good Pythonic or Perl-oid or Ruby-oid
> library will expose a different sort of interface than a C-level FFI.
Exactly. I don't care if some other language decided not to expose the C
api those languag
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:02:48PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
> Good point: Multiple mouse pointers, for example to change the size of
> windows with two fingers. Is this rather "easy to implement" or rather
> "utterly impossible to implement". The answer to this question
> could be crucial about
Perhaps my statement about "the question is answered"
was a bit premature yesterday in the evening.
I'm pleased that my initial question attracts wide
interest in this list.
Julien Guertault wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012, Thomas Adam :
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012, Michael Grosser :
>>
>>> Would it
11 matches
Mail list logo
