Re: [Megillot] falsifying methodology; 3 cases; etc.

2005-03-20 Thread RUSSELLGMIRKIN
Dear Stephen, You wrote: "...G. Athas, on detailed observation, declared that dalets were carved in a direction that, if true, falsifies the proposed scenario that a forger carved the arms of the dalet both toward the left and stopped before a stone break; further, Athas claimed that the dalet

Re: [Megillot] falsifying methodology; 3 cases; etc.

2005-03-16 Thread RUSSELLGMIRKIN
Dear Stephen, Some selective responses. (On the Tel Dan Inscription, your comments are both incorrect and out of place on Megillot, and will therefore be ignored.) You wrote: "Russell, your misrepresentation included declaring that there was no evidence other that what you mentioned" Au

Re: [Megillot] falsifying methodology; 3 cases; etc.

2005-03-16 Thread Stephen Goranson
Russell Gmirkin, In response: I do not agree with many of your recent statements. I'll mention some and try to look for a more productive way forward than the recent exchange. Briefly, as you called my comments incorrect, G. Athas, on detailed observation, declared that dalets were carved in

P.S. Re: [Megillot] falsifying methodology; 3 cases; etc.

2005-03-16 Thread Stephen Goranson
P.S. I could address further claims in R. Gmirkin's latest post, and will, if seems useful. And corroboration and coherence and chronological-suitability, for instance, are all among important aspects of worthy proposals. But I would like to state more clearly than I did before that the Qumran

Re: [Megillot] falsifying methodology; 3 cases; etc.

2005-03-15 Thread Stephen Goranson
Russell, your misrepresentation included declaring that there was no evidence other that what you mentioned, whereas you know I that draw on other evidence (too much to retype here; I hope to offer more later). Misrepresentation included again presenting Judah ensconsed in the temple, as if he

Re: [Megillot] falsifying methodology; 3 cases; etc.

2005-03-14 Thread RUSSELLGMIRKIN
Stephen, In your recent posting inviting discussion on methodology, falsification, Popper, etc., youwrite the following: But, to try 3 specific ane cases, perhaps falsifiable claims. 1) In some Qumran texts, the "wicked priest" is Alexander Jannaeus.2) In some Qumran texts, the "teacher of

Re: [Megillot] falsifying methodology; 3 cases; etc.

2005-03-14 Thread Dierk van den Berg
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:21 PM Subject: Re: [Megillot] falsifying methodology; 3 cases; etc. Russell, you have misrepresented my views especially in what I consider to be the support for them and possibilities for falsifying, so I doubt whether dialogue with you on such unreliable basis