Re: [galaxy-dev] Cloudman - is it possible to still use depreciated AMIs ?

2013-07-24 Thread Ravpreet Setia
lists.bx.psu.edu [galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu] on behalf of Ravpreet Setia [ravpreet.se...@oicr.on.ca] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 7:00 PM To: Dannon Baker Cc: galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] Cloudman - is it possible to still use depreciated AMIs ? Hey, thanks for

Re: [galaxy-dev] Cloudman - is it possible to still use depreciated AMIs ?

2013-07-23 Thread Ravpreet Setia
sion 8.4.7. From: Dannon Baker [dannon.ba...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:01 PM To: Ravpreet Setia Cc: galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] Cloudman - is it possible to still use depreciated AMIs ? Yes, you can still use the deprecated AMIs. What error are you seeing whe

Re: [galaxy-dev] Cloudman - is it possible to still use depreciated AMIs ?

2013-07-22 Thread Dannon Baker
Yes, you can still use the deprecated AMIs. What error are you seeing when you try to ssh in? On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Ravpreet Setia wrote: > I tried launching an instance specifying "ami-da58aab3" as the AMI but I > am unable to SSH or access Cloudman using the instance's URL. > > __

[galaxy-dev] Cloudman - is it possible to still use depreciated AMIs ?

2013-07-22 Thread Ravpreet Setia
I tried launching an instance specifying "ami-da58aab3" as the AMI but I am unable to SSH or access Cloudman using the instance's URL. ___ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscript