Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new

2016-01-05 Thread Björn Grüning
Hi Rémy, > Hi, > > Ok, it seems to be great. We had many problems with RPM, R, or Perl > packages not maintained/"downloadable" any more. The only SPOF I see now is > Github itself and the Cargo-Port source code ;) Perhaps you should try to > add it to python/pip ? Carogo-port is already pip ins

Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new

2016-01-05 Thread Rémy Dernat
Hi, Ok, it seems to be great. We had many problems with RPM, R, or Perl packages not maintained/"downloadable" any more. The only SPOF I see now is Github itself and the Cargo-Port source code ;) Perhaps you should try to add it to python/pip ? Best, Remy 2016-01-04 17:50 GMT+01:00 Eric Rasche :

Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new

2016-01-04 Thread Eric Rasche
Hi Peter, On 01/02/2016 11:54 PM, Peter Cock wrote: > > > On Friday, 1 January 2016, Björn Grüning > wrote: > > Hi Galaxy developers, > > this is a RFC to get the implementation details right for a new action > type in `tool_dependencies.xml`. > >

Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new

2016-01-02 Thread Peter Cock
On Friday, 1 January 2016, Björn Grüning wrote: > Hi Galaxy developers, > > this is a RFC to get the implementation details right for a new action > type in `tool_dependencies.xml`. > > Since years we try to save a very crucial sustainability problem: > **Non-sustainable links**! > > > A little

[galaxy-dev] RFC: new

2016-01-01 Thread Björn Grüning
Hi Galaxy developers, this is a RFC to get the implementation details right for a new action type in `tool_dependencies.xml`. Since years we try to save a very crucial sustainability problem: **Non-sustainable links**! A little bit of history At first we tried to [mi

Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new param attribute for Galaxy tool XML

2015-03-04 Thread Björn Grüning
Am 04.03.2015 um 02:37 schrieb John Chilton: > Peter, > > Galaxy parameters should be case sensitive I think - they are used in > plain dictionaries quite a bit and I have never seen any logic to make > them not case sensitive. I think so too, never tried it but I guess they are case sensitive

Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new param attribute for Galaxy tool XML

2015-03-03 Thread John Chilton
Peter, Galaxy parameters should be case sensitive I think - they are used in plain dictionaries quite a bit and I have never seen any logic to make them not case sensitive. Bjoern, Is this what you mean? https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/compare/dev...jmchilton:argument_name?expand=1 If

Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new param attribute for Galaxy tool XML

2015-03-03 Thread Peter Cock
Hi Björn, Command line arguments are often case sensitive (e.g. samtools switches), but are Galaxy parameter names? Peter On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Björn Grüning wrote: > Hi all, > > we are planning to work on a project to implement a Galaxy fuse based > shell. Probably starting with the

[galaxy-dev] RFC: new param attribute for Galaxy tool XML

2015-02-28 Thread Björn Grüning
Hi all, we are planning to work on a project to implement a Galaxy fuse based shell. Probably starting with the work from Clare [1]. Next to our Galaxy IPython integration it should attract more bioinformaticians and should offer a new way to interact with Galaxy. This includes moving, deleting d