Hi there.
I recently came across a nice micro-optimization to permutate bytes
within a dword. On x86 all 24 combinations can be done using a maximum
of 3 instructions (bswap, rotate32 and rotate16).
I'd like to give it a try and write an optimization pass that detects
such dword permutations
Steve Perkins wrote:
I have a question about using GCC/GCJ to compile a Java application
which uses the SWT framework for its GUI, and whether this locks you
in or out of any licensing options. I apologize in advance if this
question is somewhat off-topic... I searched "gnu.org" for a maili
I have a question about using GCC/GCJ to compile a Java application
which uses the SWT framework for its GUI, and whether this locks you in
or out of any licensing options. I apologize in advance if this
question is somewhat off-topic... I searched "gnu.org" for a mailing
list specifically
Successfully bootstrapped and installed gcc 4.3.1, using mingw32 (msys)
under WinXP.
config.guess is having problems though.
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: mingw32
Configured with: ../gcc-4.3.1/configure --with-gcc --build=mingw32
--prefix=/mingw --with-mpfd=/usrlocal --with-gmp=/usrloc
Okay, i isolated the problem (we are folding based on the wrong type
for constants, so we have a case where 1 << 63 becomes 0 instead of a
very large value).
Working on a patch now.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Paolo
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > The GCC 4.1 branch is now closed and should have no further commits. All
> > open bugs at the 4.1.3 milestone, or marked as [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4
> > Regression] or similar, have been updated
Eric Blake ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jerry DeLisle on 6/29/2008 11:45 AM:
| Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
|> CC'ed to Eric. This may require some configury patches somewhere.
|>
| Adjust strsignal to POSIX 200x prototype.
| * strsignal.c (s
Hi Joseph,
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> The GCC 4.1 branch is now closed and should have no further commits. All
> open bugs at the 4.1.3 milestone, or marked as [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4
> Regression] or similar, have been updated accordingly.
I wonder, could/should this also become a
