Can I make a array aligned with 16 byte at RTL pass?
Thanks!
--
Jianzhang Peng
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Aravinda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Im trying to identify all indirect references in a loop so that, after
> this analysis, I have a list of tree_nodes of pointer_type that are
> dereferenced in a loop along with their step size, if any.
>
> E.g.
> while(i++ < n)
> {
> *(p
The following draft patch disables the debuginfo disabling when using
-flto or -fwhopr and fixes up things so that for C debugging (mostly)
works.
The main question I have is how to proceed further here (with the
goal that simple debugging should be possible in 4.5). If we
apply this patch then
Joern Rennecke writes:
> If you need more rigid scheduling, you can use CC0.
No, please don't. I accept that CC0 is necessary today for a few
processors, but I really don't think we should encourage any new uses
of it.
Ian
As I continue my work on the machine description file, I currently
worked on the bitfields again to try to get a good code generation
working. Right now, I've followed what was done in the ia64 for signed
extractions :
(define_insn "extv"
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "gr_register_operand" "=r")
The public comment draft of the DWARF Version 4 Standard
should be available some time next month. It will be
on the DWARF website: http://dwarfstd.org.
If you want to receive a notification when this is available,
please sign up on the DWARF announcements mailing list:
http://lists.dwarfstd.or
Hi
I hope someone can help me. I've been trying to write some tight integer loops
in way that could be auto-vectorized, saving me to write assembler or using
specific vectorization extensions. Unfortunately I've not yet managed to make
gcc vectorize any of them.
I've simplified the case to ju
Interestingly enough, if I do this instead:
typedef struct sTest {
int a:12;
int b:20;
int c:7;
int d:15;
}STest;
int64_t bar2 (STest *a)
{
int64_t res = a->b;
return res;
}
I get at the expand pass :
(insn 6 5 7 3 struct3.c:27 (set (reg:SI 75)
(mem/s:SI (reg/v/
On 10/12/2009 7:43 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
Hi,
When I visit:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/
at Wed Dec 9 10:41:43 PST 2009, I didn't see "December, 2009".
It was there yesterday. Has anyone else seen it? You may need to
clear browser cache first.
The page sends
