On 12/05/2014 04:18, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Status
> ==
>
> It is time for another 4.8 release, I'd like to create 4.8.4 release
> candidate at the end of the next week and if all goes well, 4.8.4 release
> a week after that. If you have any safe fixes you'd like to be backported,
> please do
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20141211 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20141211/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 03:13:50PM +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> So I am wondering if I can rely on INSN_LUID checking orders of
> difference instruction. If it can be done, I can easily differentiate
> live range shrink and extend.
> Further question is, if we don't insert new insns, can I use INSN_L
Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > So at the very least, we should bring the documentation in line with the
> > actual behavior. However, as seen above, that actual behavior is probably
> > not really useful in any case, at least in C.
> >
> >
> >
Hi,
I'm working on MIPS SIMD support for MSA. Can anyone point me towards
information about the need for an integer mode of equal size to any
supported vector mode?
I.e. if I support V4SImode is there any core GCC requirement that
TImode is also supported?
Any guidance is appreciated. The MIPS p
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we've noticed the following behavior of the GCC vector extension, and were
> wondering whether this is actually intentional:
>
> When you use binary operators on two vectors, GCC will accept not only
> operands
> that use the sa
