On Jun 11 2024, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
> I suspect that io_quotes_def and io_quotes_use in particular often get
> applied spuriously.
The message "Applying foo" does not mean that the header is actually
changed. That only happens if you see "Fixed: foo.h".
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs,
On Mai 08 2024, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> removed from C99.
I think you mean "removed from C *after* C99".
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
On Mär 18 2024, David Brown wrote:
> I think it would be possible to have an implementation where "signed
> char" was 8-bit two's complement except that 0x80 would be a trap
> representation rather than -128.
signed char cannot have padding bits, thus it cannot have a trap
representation.
--
An
On Mär 14 2024, Andrew Cooper via Gcc wrote:
> so any known-constant value can be folded. What I'm dealing with is the
> remainder of the cases.
Which cases remain?
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now fo
On Okt 19 2023, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2023-10-18T15:42:18+0100, R jd <3246251196r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I guess I can ask, why there is not a recursive approach for configuring
>> GCC. e.g. AC_SUBDIRS in the top level?
>
> ('AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS' you mean.) You know, often it just ta
On Sep 17 2023, Paul Floyd via Gcc wrote:
> However, Valgrind thinks that these transpositions can't be done when
> there are potentially trapping memory loads like *f.
*f is not doing any pointer dereference. It just reads the _M_payload
member of f.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.
On Sep 04 2023, Vincent Rivière wrote:
> By looking at the sections generated by m68k-elf-g++, I noticed there was
> relocations to odd addresses in the .eh_frame section. Is this expected?
> Is there a way to avoid that, maybe by adding some padding?
I think you need to change ASM_PREFERRED_EH_D
This looks like being part of gas, so you need to ask on
.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
On Mai 10 2023, Sam James wrote:
> Andreas Schwab writes:
>
>> On Mai 10 2023, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
>>
>>> Ondřej Kubánek via Gcc writes:
>>>
Hello,
I have tried to push a tag to my user space /tags/ ref in the GCC repo. The
tag is annotated but the push was rejected. Her
On Mai 10 2023, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
> Ondřej Kubánek via Gcc writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have tried to push a tag to my user space /tags/ ref in the GCC repo. The
>> tag is annotated but the push was rejected. Here is the command
>>
>> git push origin master:refs/users/kubaneko/tags/Thesis T
On Mai 10 2023, Ondřej Kubánek via Gcc wrote:
> ! [remote rejected] master -> refs/users/kubaneko/tags/Thesis
> (hook declined)
As you can see here, you are not pushing the tag Thesis, but the local
branch master.
If you want to push the local tag Thesis to a particular place on the
rem
On Aug 31 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> Can please anybody reproduce that? I've also tried touching all files in my
> original repo,
> but still, no change.
Probably a bug in automake, it oscillates between the two states in a
random way. The contents of autom4te.cache/requests also changes each
On Jul 13 2022, Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha wrote:
> note that glibc headers have to be namespace clean so it
> would be more like
>
> __attribute__((__fd_argument (__access, 1)))
> __attribute__((__fd_argument (__read, 1)))
> __attribute__((__fd_argument (__write, 1)))
>
> so it would be e
13 matches
Mail list logo
