On 07 Feb 2007 15:36:14 -0800
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anybody else out there recreate this on their x86_64 system?
Not that I could not recreate the segfault but I found a way to hide the
segfault. Instead of optimizing with nocona
make \
LDFLAGS
On 07 Feb 2007 15:36:14 -0800
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hanno Meyer-Thurow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > sorry to bother again. I reduced the code (attached) that segfaults here
> > on Core 2 Duo [1]. If I add -fno-split-wide-types t
On 07 Feb 2007 13:46:43 -0800
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * lower-subreg.c (resolve_clobber): Handle a subreg of a concatn.
Yes, that is there. I have revision 121690.
Hanno
Hi Ian,
sorry to bother again. I reduced the code (attached) that segfaults here
on Core 2 Duo [1]. If I add -fno-split-wide-types the code does not segfault.
That flag comes from your patchset [2].
execute:
# ./cc1 -quiet -m64 -O1 test.c -o test.o
Any ideas?
Regards,
Hanno
[1] http://gcc.gnu
Hi list!
First, I am not subscribed to this list, so please CC me on answers, thanks!
I try to build gcc trunk (r121622) on x86_64/core2duo but I get an ICE.
Thanks for any help in advance!
Regards,
Hanno
___
Build config:
# ./xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Confi
