On May 4, 2006, at 5:05 AM, jacob navia wrote:
Well, I searched for those and found some usage examples in the
source of Apple Darwin gcc code for the startup. But then... is
that current?
This question lacks any detail that would allow me to answer it.
With enough detail, I could.
ALL
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:49:03PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Are these an exported API?
Inasmuch as we've got to support them forever for binary
compatibility, I don't see why not.
r~
> "jacob" == jacob navia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Unfortunately things are also worse for libgcj, in that we need to be
>> able to generate stack traces as well, and the trampoline function
>> approach won't work there.
>>
jacob> ? Sorry I do not follow here
The java runtime needs
jacob navia writes:
> Andrew Haley a écrit :
>
> >Richard Henderson writes:
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:23:56PM +0200, jacob navia wrote:
> > > > Is there an equivalent API for linux?
> > >
> > > __register_frame_info_bases / __deregister_frame_info_bases.
> >
> >Are these an export
Richard Henderson writes:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:23:56PM +0200, jacob navia wrote:
> > Is there an equivalent API for linux?
>
> __register_frame_info_bases / __deregister_frame_info_bases.
Are these an exported API?
I metioned the existence of these entry points in a reply to Jacob
Andrew Haley a écrit :
Richard Henderson writes:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:23:56PM +0200, jacob navia wrote:
> > Is there an equivalent API for linux?
>
> __register_frame_info_bases / __deregister_frame_info_bases.
Are these an exported API?
I metioned the existence of these entry poi
On May 3, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Perry Smith wrote:
Can a link be added in the g++ documentation to this page?
You mean as we've done on:
http://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html
under
The V3 multi-vendor standard C++ ABI is used in GCC releases 3.0
and above
and
DWARF Workgroup
? Yes, we c
On May 3, 2006, at 8:58 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:12:43AM -0500, Perry Smith wrote:
On May 2, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On May 2, 2006, at 4:23 AM, jacob navia wrote:
To get to the corresponding catch, the runtime should skip through
the intermediate
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:23:56PM +0200, jacob navia wrote:
> Is there an equivalent API for linux?
__register_frame_info_bases / __deregister_frame_info_bases.
r~
Tom Tromey a écrit :
"jacob" == jacob navia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jacob> This application generates dynamically code and executes it, using a
jacob> JIT, a Just In time Compiler. Everything is working OK until the C++
jacob> code generates a throw.
Fun!
I looked at this a
> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> Adding an entry point to register debug info should not be a big deal.
Andrew> We're going to need it for gcj when we add a JIT.
Or for our already existing JITs :-) (Not that either of those support
dwarf-style unwinding yet.)
T
> "jacob" == jacob navia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jacob> This application generates dynamically code and executes it, using a
jacob> JIT, a Just In time Compiler. Everything is working OK until the C++
jacob> code generates a throw.
Fun!
I looked at this a little bit with libgcj.
In some
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:36:33AM +0200, jacob navia wrote:
> Maybe there is some references somewhere about this?
> Which JIT? Is there a source code example or something?
I'm only familiar with proprietary JITs.
> Would sljl exceptions work?
This has already been answered. Basically, no.
--
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:12:43AM -0500, Perry Smith wrote:
> On May 2, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> >On May 2, 2006, at 4:23 AM, jacob navia wrote:
> >>To get to the corresponding catch, the runtime should skip through
> >>the intermediate frames in assembler generated by the JIT. W
On May 2, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On May 2, 2006, at 4:23 AM, jacob navia wrote:
To get to the corresponding catch, the runtime should skip through
the intermediate frames in assembler generated by the JIT. We
would like to know how should be the interface with gcc to do this.
Andrew Haley writes:
> Jakub Jelinek writes:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:14:23AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > Adding an entry point to register debug info should not be a big deal.
> > > We're going to need it for gcj when we add a JIT.
> > >
> > > Another interesting possibility
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:14:23AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Adding an entry point to register debug info should not be a big deal.
> > We're going to need it for gcj when we add a JIT.
> >
> > Another interesting possibility would be runtime extensions to
> > MD
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:14:23AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Adding an entry point to register debug info should not be a big deal.
> We're going to need it for gcj when we add a JIT.
>
> Another interesting possibility would be runtime extensions to
> MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR. That would b
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:21:24PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> > >Otherwise, would it be possible to generate the DWARF Tables and
> > >add those tables dynamically to the running program?
> >
> > Yes (could require OS changes).
> >
> > >Under windows, Microsof
Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:21:24PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
Otherwise, would it be possible to generate the DWARF Tables and
add those tables dynamically to the running program?
Yes (could require OS changes).
Under windows, Microsoft provides an AP
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:21:24PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> >Otherwise, would it be possible to generate the DWARF Tables and
> >add those tables dynamically to the running program?
>
> Yes (could require OS changes).
>
> >Under windows, Microsoft provides an API for JITs that does exactly
On May 2, 2006, at 4:23 AM, jacob navia wrote:
To get to the corresponding catch, the runtime should skip through
the intermediate frames in assembler generated by the JIT. We would
like to know how should be the interface with gcc to do this.
The C++ abi spec and dwarf specs are good backgr
Hi
We have an application compiled with gcc written in C++.
This application generates dynamically code and executes it, using a
JIT, a Just In time Compiler. Everything is working OK until the C++
code generates a throw.
To get to the corresponding catch, the runtime should skip through the
23 matches
Mail list logo
