On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 2:06 AM James K. Lowden
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 May 2024 21:40:44 +0200
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you don't link cobol1 with the correct make variables
> > as other FEs are linked?
>
> First, thank you for the careful answer. It allowed me to trace
> through the m
On Wed, 8 May 2024 21:40:44 +0200
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Perhaps you don't link cobol1 with the correct make variables
> as other FEs are linked?
First, thank you for the careful answer. It allowed me to trace
through the machinery. And I confirmed that it works, usually.
The Make-lang.in f
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 04:40:55PM -0400, James K. Lowden wrote:
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.32' not
> found (required by build-O2/gcc/cobol1
The cc1/cc1plus/f951/... binaries are normally linked with
-static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc in second and later stages (fir
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.32' not
found (required by build-O2/gcc/cobol1
The above error comes from ldd(1).
I'm experimenting with what's minimally needed to install gcc when
configured with --languages=cobol. Until this week, we always used
--languages=c++,cob
