> On 03/21/2018 10:26 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>Hi.
> >>
> >>I did similar stats for postgresql server, more precisely for pgbench:
> >>pgbench -s100 & 10 runs of pgbench -t1 -v
> >
> >Without looking at the benchmark
On 03/21/2018 10:26 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
I did similar stats for postgresql server, more precisely for pgbench:
pgbench -s100 & 10 runs of pgbench -t1 -v
Without looking at the benchmark probably only because
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I did similar stats for postgresql server, more precisely for pgbench:
> pgbench -s100 & 10 runs of pgbench -t1 -v
Without looking at the benchmark probably only because it is flawed
(aka not I/O or memory
Hi.
I did similar stats for postgresql server, more precisely for pgbench:
pgbench -s100 & 10 runs of pgbench -t1 -v
Martin
pgbench-gcc-test.pdf.bz2
Description: application/bzip
pgbench-gcc-test.ods
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet