[Bug libstdc++/47045] NetBSD: define changes in ctype.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-24 01:32:19 UTC --- Building GCC snapshots made easy: http://advogato.org/person/redi/diary/229.html

[Bug libstdc++/47058] New: "--enable-maintainer-mode --disable-werror" wrongly upgrades warnings to errors in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47058 Summary: "--enable-maintainer-mode --disable-werror" wrongly upgrades warnings to errors in libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/47055] "make profiledbootstrap" fails on MSYS/mingw-w64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47055 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug testsuite/47057] New: FAIL/XPASS gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-outer-fir.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47057 Summary: FAIL/XPASS gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-outer-fir.c Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug rtl-optimization/45352] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7058

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352 --- Comment #24 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-12-23 20:56:46 UTC --- Created attachment 22848 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22848 testcase failing in r168214 Thank you for fixing all the problem so far, but there seems to be furth

[Bug ada/47056] New: [4.6 Regression] 10 Ada ACATS tests fail to link with undefined reference on ia64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056 Summary: [4.6 Regression] 10 Ada ACATS tests fail to link with undefined reference on ia64-linux Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: link-failure

[Bug fortran/47054] Compilation error when cray pointers are declared in both host and internal subroutines

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-23 19:33:04 UTC --- > What compilation error? For me it is [macbook] f90/bug% gfc -fcray-pointer pr47054.f90 pr47054.f90:23.29: pointer (paxg_8, G_xg_8(G_ni))

[Bug fortran/47054] Compilation error when cray pointers are declared in both host and internal subroutines

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/46758] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -fgraphite-identity produces wrong code when using 64bit constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46758 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/43023] missing SSA_NAME def for -ftree-loop-distribution in 459.GemsFDTD

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43023 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/45552] [graphite] ICE in sese_loop_depth, at sese.h:172

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45552 --- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-23 18:52:08 UTC --- Author: spop Date: Thu Dec 23 18:52:04 2010 New Revision: 168213 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168213 Log: Fix PR45552: backport fix for PR45758 to 4.5 branch.

[Bug middle-end/46758] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -fgraphite-identity produces wrong code when using 64bit constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46758 --- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-23 18:52:15 UTC --- Author: spop Date: Thu Dec 23 18:52:12 2010 New Revision: 168214 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168214 Log: Fix PR46758: Do not use int_cst_value. 2010-12-23

[Bug tree-optimization/43023] missing SSA_NAME def for -ftree-loop-distribution in 459.GemsFDTD

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43023 --- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-23 18:51:55 UTC --- Author: spop Date: Thu Dec 23 18:51:51 2010 New Revision: 168212 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168212 Log: Fix PR43023: fuse_partitions_with_similar_memory_acc

[Bug bootstrap/47055] New: "make profiledbootstrap" fails on MSYS/mingw-w64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47055 Summary: "make profiledbootstrap" fails on MSYS/mingw-w64 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedT

[Bug regression/47037] 465.tonto Segmentation Fault in memset with -fcaller-saves (default at -O2 or higher)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037 --- Comment #4 from Changpeng Fang 2010-12-23 18:08:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Can you supply a simplified test case? > The difficulty is that the bug only shows up on a new AMD system (bobcat). The compiled binary on bobcat can run

[Bug regression/47037] 465.tonto Segmentation Fault in memset with -fcaller-saves (default at -O2 or higher)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037 Changpeng Fang changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|465.tonto Segmentation |465.tonto Segmentation

[Bug fortran/47054] New: Compilation error when cray pointers are declared in both host and internal subroutines

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054 Summary: Compilation error when cray pointers are declared in both host and internal subroutines Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/47051] [4.6 Regression] wrong reallocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/46029] -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores causes FAIL: libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/pb_ds/example/tree_intervals.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46029 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46758] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -fgraphite-identity produces wrong code when using 64bit constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46758 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0 Version|4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/47001] segmentation fault in vect_mark_slp_stmts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47001 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/47017] [4.6 Regression] gnatlib ICE on sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46941] [trans-mem] new/delete operator are unsafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Marlier 2010-12-23 16:27:47 UTC --- Aldy. I think you should declare it 'transaction_safe' and not 'transaction_pure' since symbols in the libitm are binded to safe: _ZGTtnwm; _ZGTtnam; _ZGTtdl

[Bug middle-end/46758] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -fgraphite-identity produces wrong code when using 64bit constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46758 --- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-23 16:26:17 UTC --- Author: spop Date: Thu Dec 23 16:26:11 2010 New Revision: 168211 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168211 Log: Fix PR46758: Do not use int_cst_value. 2010-12-23

[Bug tree-optimization/47002] [4.6 Regression] segmentation fault in find_uses_to_rename_use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47002 --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-23 16:25:59 UTC --- Author: spop Date: Thu Dec 23 16:25:52 2010 New Revision: 168210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168210 Log: Fix PR47002: memory leaks. 2010-12-23 Sebastian Po

[Bug c++/46941] [trans-mem] new/delete operator are unsafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2010-12-23 16:19:12 UTC --- Patrick. You will find out that when hacking on GCC, everything is intrusive in non-obvious ways :). What I had in mind was something simple like this, since push_cp_library_fn() on

[Bug preprocessor/47047] Support for path translation in __FILE__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47047 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-23 16:13:53 UTC --- On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, joerg at britannica dot bec.de wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, joerg at netbsd dot org wrote: > > > > > The patch is the version included in NetB

[Bug tree-optimization/47053] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 2 can not throw but has an EH edge with -O -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47053 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/47053] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 2 can not throw but has an EH edge with -O -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47053 Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 2 can not throw but has an EH edge with -O -fnon-call-exceptions Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status:

[Bug c++/46941] [trans-mem] new/delete operator are unsafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Marlier 2010-12-23 15:45:15 UTC --- Actually, I was guessing that the patch was not intrusive. Wrong guess, play again... I should really spend more time on hacking gcc ;) Anyway, Thank you for your advices! (I will f

[Bug fortran/47051] [4.6 Regression] wrong reallocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051 --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele 2010-12-23 15:32:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Hi Dominique, I have read exactly this: > 3 If the variable is an unallocated allocatable array, expr shall have the > same > rank. If the variable is

[Bug fortran/47051] [4.6 Regression] wrong reallocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-23 15:13:46 UTC --- I have raised a similar question in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg4.html answered in the following posts in this thread. The relevant part of the standard (from

[Bug rtl-optimization/45051] [4.6 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c and abs-3.c due to "track subwords of DImode allocnos"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45051 --- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-12-23 14:29:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Nevertheless, I'm testing r162418 with your patch. FWIW, no regressions for cris-elf, with your patch (manually) applied on top of Bernds's patch appli

[Bug libstdc++/47052] New: make: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1 Cross compile GCC for Alpha Architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47052 Summary: make: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1 Cross compile GCC for Alpha Architecture Product: gcc Version: 4.0.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/47051] [4.6 Regression] wrong reallocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051 --- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele 2010-12-23 13:56:29 UTC --- OK, more checking. F2003 specifies that the lhs should only be deallocated if it differs in shape. a and b have the same shape here.

[Bug fortran/47051] [4.6 Regression] wrong reallocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051 --- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele 2010-12-23 13:46:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > ... so I would not expect this. > > Why? that would imply that F95 code and F2003 code are not compatible ? Or was this not allowed in F95 (certainl

[Bug fortran/46978] [4.6 Regression] TRANSPOSE with RESHAPE and ALLOCATE: Segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46978] [4.6 Regression] TRANSPOSE with RESHAPE and ALLOCATE: Segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin 2010-12-23 13:39:10 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Thu Dec 23 13:39:06 2010 New Revision: 168207 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168207 Log: 2010-12-23 Mikael Morin PR fortran/46978

[Bug fortran/47051] [4.6 Regression] wrong reallocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-23 13:36:40 UTC --- > ... so I would not expect this. Why?

[Bug fortran/46978] [4.6 Regression] TRANSPOSE with RESHAPE and ALLOCATE: Segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin 2010-12-23 13:35:57 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Thu Dec 23 13:35:53 2010 New Revision: 168206 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168206 Log: 2010-12-23 Mikael Morin PR fortran/46978

[Bug fortran/47051] New: [4.6 Regression] wrong reallocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051 Summary: [4.6 Regression] wrong reallocate Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc

[Bug testsuite/47050] New: gcc.target/i386/aggregate-ret[12].c FAIL with -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47050 Summary: gcc.target/i386/aggregate-ret[12].c FAIL with -m64 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assigne

[Bug preprocessor/47047] Support for path translation in __FILE__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47047 --- Comment #2 from joerg at britannica dot bec.de 2010-12-23 12:51:33 UTC --- On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:16:40PM +, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47047 > > --- Comment #1 from joseph at co

[Bug c++/46626] [4.6 Regression] simple use of virtual methods causes pure virtual method call in c++0x mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46626 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug testsuite/41146] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/asm-es-2.c scan-assembler *

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41146 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-23 12:34:27 UTC --- An updated patch has been posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01765.html .

[Bug preprocessor/47047] Support for path translation in __FILE__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47047 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-23 12:16:37 UTC --- On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, joerg at netbsd dot org wrote: > The patch is the version included in NetBSD against the system gcc, it can be > updated if necessary. Who are th

[Bug ada/47017] [4.6 Regression] gnatlib ICE on sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017 --- Comment #1 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-12-23 10:27:54 UTC --- on sparc32-linux (--with-cpu=v8) bootstrap and gnatlib work fine: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-12/msg02070.html So this is a 64 bits issue.

[Bug target/46934] gcc ICE: error: unrecognizable insn: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46934 Chung-Lin Tang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/47045] NetBSD: define changes in ctype.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/46720] [4.6 Regression] missing quadmath_weak.h with --enable-maintainer-mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46720 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/46720] [4.6 Regression] missing quadmath_weak.h with --enable-maintainer-mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46720 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-23 09:41:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > * PING * > > Can you still reproduce it -- with the correct version of automake installed? With the correct automake, there is no error. Close as INVALID?

[Bug libstdc++/47045] NetBSD: define changes in ctype.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Klausner 2010-12-23 09:35:32 UTC --- I can test on 5.99.40 and 5.99.41/amd64. Just send me short instructions how to test. Thanks!

[Bug c++/47049] internal compiler error: in write_unnamed_type_name due to C++0x lamba use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049 --- Comment #3 from Eamon Nerbonne 2010-12-23 09:33:11 UTC --- Oh, and finally: a comment on the mingw64 tracker is meaningless to me but perhaps useful to you: ktietz70 said: "So, I investigate your issue a bit. First this is for sure a gcc bug

[Bug c++/47049] internal compiler error: in write_unnamed_type_name due to C++0x lamba use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049 --- Comment #2 from Eamon Nerbonne 2010-12-23 09:31:24 UTC --- Created attachment 22844 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22844 Unpreprocessed source (depends on Eigen3)

[Bug c++/47049] internal compiler error: in write_unnamed_type_name due to C++0x lamba use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049 --- Comment #1 from Eamon Nerbonne 2010-12-23 09:30:20 UTC --- Created attachment 22843 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22843 G++'s output

[Bug c++/47049] New: internal compiler error: in write_unnamed_type_name due to C++0x lamba use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049 Summary: internal compiler error: in write_unnamed_type_name due to C++0x lamba use Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug regression/47037] 465.tonto Segmentation Fault in memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/46978] [4.6 Regression] TRANSPOSE with RESHAPE and ALLOCATE: Segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978 --- Comment #9 from Martien Hulsen 2010-12-23 09:13:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > This seems to fix it, though I find it somewhat suspicious. With this change all my test cases run fine again. Thanks.